Stiffness Matrix of Frictionless Plate Support: Puzzling Differences

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the discrepancies in the stiffness matrix components Kxx and Kyy for a plate supported by frictionless edges in ANSYS. The user initially aimed for equal stiffness values but encountered issues due to boundary conditions (BCs) and the geometric configuration of the plate. It was concluded that changing the support type to fixed support resulted in equal Kxx and Kyy values. The importance of correctly defining BCs and understanding the model's node configuration is emphasized as critical for accurate finite element analysis (FEA).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ANSYS software for finite element analysis
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions (BCs) in structural modeling
  • Familiarity with stiffness matrix concepts in mechanics
  • Basic principles of node and element configurations in FEA
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore ANSYS boundary condition settings and their impact on stiffness matrices
  • Learn about the differences between frictionless and fixed supports in FEA
  • Investigate the use of mid-side nodes in ANSYS for improved geometric accuracy
  • Study the principles of stiffness matrix formulation in finite element methods
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, structural analysts, and anyone involved in finite element modeling and analysis using ANSYS, particularly those troubleshooting stiffness matrix discrepancies.

Mohamed_Wael
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1469943346.394802.jpg


Hi all,
In the attached photo, you can find a plate supported along the edge by "frictionless" support and I am trying to obtain the stiffness matrix using the node at the center. I wonder why the Kxx and Kyy (highlighted) are not equivalent or even near to each other, any suggestions?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Im not familiar with ANSYS, but are those arrows your BCs (the supports)? It looks like you have "BCs" at the centerpoints between the edge nodes...Is that the case?

Also, are the BCs on the upper right hand side of the upper right half the same as the BCs on the lower left (asking because the arrows are different)?

Also, can you explain what you mean by the stiffness matrix at the node at the center? The Stiffness matrix applies to the entire structure (or a substructure), and doesn't describe a single point.
 
First thanks for your care,
1-actually I wanted to divide the plate in such homogeneous way trying to get equal Kxx and Kyy, but this lead to triangular base and not circular edge, but when u define the boundary conditions you define it for the circular edge geometry, that's why they look like flying supports.
2-I defined a frictionless support allover the edge they should be the same, I don't know why Ansys mark them in this way
3-when I extract the stiffness matrix I should define the DOF by selecting the nodes and the required DOF, that's what I mean
4-I have just tried changing the type of support to fixed support and I got equal Kxx and Kyy! i will attach the image.
thanks again
 

Attachments

  • Capture2.JPG
    Capture2.JPG
    38.9 KB · Views: 618
Good to hear.

The "support type" (constraints or BCs) is very critical in FEA. When I was learning, my constraints were the cause of most of my mistakes. It helps to think of things in terms of nodes instead of physical shapes (that is, as a series of triangles instead of a circle).
 
What kind of elements are you using for this model? Have you considered using elements with mid-side nodes to allow for a curved outer edge?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
9K