Stopping distance inclined plane

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The stopping distance on an inclined plane can be calculated using the formula d = v_i² / (2g sin(θ) - μ_k g cos(θ)), where v_i is the initial velocity, g is the acceleration due to gravity, θ is the angle of the incline, and μ_k is the coefficient of kinetic friction. This formula accounts for both gravitational and frictional forces acting on the mass. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering the normal force and the net force relative to the incline when deriving the stopping distance equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as forces and acceleration.
  • Familiarity with Newton's second law of motion.
  • Knowledge of kinematic equations, particularly those involving stopping distances.
  • Basic understanding of friction and its coefficients, specifically kinetic friction.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the normal force on an inclined plane.
  • Study the effects of different coefficients of friction on stopping distances.
  • Learn about energy conservation principles in the context of inclined planes.
  • Explore advanced kinematic equations and their applications in real-world scenarios.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, engineers working on mechanical systems, and anyone interested in understanding motion on inclined planes and the effects of friction.

gracedescent
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
If the stopping distance with kinetic to static friction is:

d=vi2/2ukg

Then,

What is the stopping distance equation on an inclined plane?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you get that forumula?

Do the same thing, except you have to deal with kinetic energy being lost to friction and being converted to gravitational potential energy.
 
Well,

I have that:

(initial velocity) vi=20m/s
(kinetic coefficient) uk=0.180
(angle) \Theta=5*

So,

In that: d=vi2/2ukg

The only addition would have to be of sin5 at the denominator?
 
The formula is correct.
It's derived from :

The acceleration of the mass ( thing ) is determined by \frac{Fx}{m}.
The force acting on the mass is only -Fk.
So, the acceleration of the mass is -g*\mu k...1
So ( input the first equation ) :
v' = v + a*t
t = \frac{V}{g*\mu k}...2
And
s = vt +\frac{1}{2}at^2
use the first and the second equation
s = \frac{v^2}{2g*\mu k}

Hope you can derive the equation of stopping distance on inclined plane !
 
Oh, your killing me with all these edifying intimations. Yes, indeed, I will try! :smile:

Thank youu..
 
s= vi2/2gsin\Thetauk

is that correct?
 
prob_solv said:
The formula is correct.
It's derived from :

The acceleration of the mass ( thing ) is determined by \frac{Fx}{m}.
The force acting on the mass is only -Fk.
So, the acceleration of the mass is -g*\mu k...1
So ( input the first equation ) :
v' = v + a*t
t = \frac{V}{g*\mu k}...2
And
s = vt +\frac{1}{2}at^2
use the first and the second equation
s = \frac{v^2}{2g*\mu k}

Hope you can derive the equation of stopping distance on inclined plane !

That is only correct for a flat incline. For a complete answer, you would have to take into consideration the normal force and the net force relative to the incline.
Remember:
F_{friction}\equiv \mu_k N
And on an inclined plane, there is also a component of gravity opposite the direction of friction. You must take that into consideration as well, when calculating the net acceleration of the mass.

From there, kinematics should suffice.

A work-energy approach would work here as well, but that's outside your scope at the moment, right?
 
Correct, out of the scope. I only need the accelration. Only problem, I totally agree with your remark on the normal force. But you need a mass to figure out this. In this case the skiers mass and force is omitted. I only was given the initial velocity, kinetic coefficient, and angle of descent.

n = mgcos

and this Fg opposite to the friction?

well, this = mgsin

However, note that in the above the mass drops out.

Ergo, why I thought that the equation would be:

s= vi2/2gsin\Thetauk

Then again... mgsin\Theta - ffk = max=ma

So, a = gsin\Theta-ffk

Correct?

So,

s= vi2/2gsin-ffk
I think... maybe not, still.

If I do not have the mass where as g is constant I am stuck, right?
 
gracedescent said:
Correct, out of the scope. I only need the accelration. Only problem, I totally agree with your remark on the normal force. But you need a mass to figure out this. In this case the skiers mass and force is omitted. I only was given the initial velocity, kinetic coefficient, and angle of descent.

n = mgcos

and this Fg opposite to the friction?

well, this = mgsin

However, note that in the above the mass drops out.

Ergo, why I thought that the equation would be:

s= vi2/2gsin\Thetauk

Then again... mgsin\Theta - ffk = max=ma

So, a = gsin\Theta-ffk

Correct?

So,

s= vi2/2gsin-ffk
I think... maybe not, still.

If I do not have the mass where as g is constant I am stuck, right?

The mass is irrelevant. You are only asked about velocities and accelerations. As all of your accelerations are tied into the gravitational acceleration, which is uniform regardless of mass, you can use a rearranged form of Newton's second law to find the acceleration.

\vec a=\frac{\vec F}{m}

Also, you have a mistake in your very final line.

Starting from v_f^2=v_0^2+2ad
Isolating d provides us with:
d=\frac{v_f^2-v_0^2}{2a}

Our final velocity is 0, since we're looking for the stopping distance, and the net acceleration of the mass can be found using Newton's second law:
\vec a=\frac{\vec F}{m}

The net force in the direction of the slope is, as you've found:
\Sigma \vec F=mg\sin{\theta}-F_{friction}
\Sigma \vec F=mg\sin{\theta}-\mu_k*N

Find N, and the problem should become trivial.
Try drawing an FBD, and everything should become clear. Break gravity down into its components, and remember that the mass is at equilibrium in the direction perpendicular to the slope.
 
  • #10
\sum\textbf{F}=mgsin\theta-\muk*mgcos\theta

Okay, I see now... Thank you.
 
  • #11
a=gsin{\theta}-\mu_k*gcos{\theta}

thus,

d=\frac{v_f^2-v_0^2}{2gsin{\theta}-\mu_k*gcos{\theta}}


? :D
 
  • #12
Close enough, just don't forget that the 2 in the denominator encompasses both components of the acceleration.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K