STRACT: Understanding the Commutator of Position and Hamiltonian Operators

  • Thread starter Thread starter 8614smith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutator
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the commutator of position and Hamiltonian operators in quantum mechanics, specifically the expression \([\hat{x},\hat{H}]\). Participants are exploring the mathematical manipulation of derivatives involved in this expression.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate the expression for the commutator and seeks clarification on the transition between different forms of the equation. Some participants provide hints regarding the application of the product rule for derivatives and question the assumptions made about certain terms equating to zero.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the mathematical details, offering hints and questioning the validity of certain steps. There is a recognition of the complexity involved in applying the product rule, and some participants express confusion about the results of their manipulations. The discussion is ongoing, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific mathematical identities and assumptions about derivatives that are under scrutiny. Participants are also addressing the implications of homework constraints on their reasoning.

8614smith
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine [tex]\left[\hat{x},\hat{H}\right][/tex]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


[tex]=x\left(-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\delta^2}{\delta{x^2}}+V\right)\Psi-\left(-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\delta^2}{\delta{x^2}}+V\right)x\psi[/tex]

[tex]x\left(-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{{\delta^2}\psi}{\delta{x^2}}+V\psi\right)+\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{{\delta^2}(x\psi)}{\delta{x^2}}-Vx\psi[/tex]

[tex]x\left(-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{{\delta^2}}{\delta{x^2}}\right)+\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\delta}{\delta{x}}\left(\psi+x\frac{\delta\psi}{\delta{x}}\right)[/tex]

How do you get from the 2nd line to the 3rd? is it an identity of partial differentials? can someone explain how to split the d squared term into two separate parts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi 8614smith! :smile:

(use "\partial" not "\delta" :wink:)

Hint: ∂2/∂x2(xψ) = (∂2x/∂x2)ψ + 2(∂x/∂x)(∂ψ/∂x) + x∂2/∂x2(ψ) :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi 8614smith! :smile:

(use "\partial" not "\delta" :wink:)

Hint: ∂2/∂x2(xψ) = (∂2x/∂x2)ψ + 2(∂x/∂x)(∂ψ/∂x) + x∂2/∂x2(ψ) :wink:


And one more hint: (∂2x/∂x2)ψ = 0.
 
Altabeh said:
And one more hint: (∂2x/∂x2)ψ = 0.
why does this = 0? i would have thought it would equal [tex]\psi[/tex]

Hint: ∂2/∂x2(xψ) = (∂2x/∂x2)ψ + 2(∂x/∂x)(∂ψ/∂x) + x∂2/∂x2(ψ)
assuming the above quote is correct and the 1st term = 0, I have got to the 3rd line - except that i now have an extra 2 in the equation, how do i get rid of this?

and has your identity worked the same way as expanding expanding ( )^2?
 
8614smith said:
why does this = 0? i would have thought it would equal [tex]\psi[/tex]


assuming the above quote is correct and the 1st term = 0, I have got to the 3rd line - except that i now have an extra 2 in the equation, how do i get rid of this?

and has your identity worked the same way as expanding expanding ( )^2?

But I got the right answer. Let's make it look better: [tex]\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{{\partial^2} (x\psi)}{\partial{x^2}}=\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{{\partial}}{\partial{x}}\left(\frac{{\partial} (x\psi)}{\partial{x}}\right)[/tex]. Now use the simple rule (xy)'=x'y+y'x and see what happens.
AB
 
8614smith said:
why does this = 0? i would have thought it would equal [tex]\psi[/tex]

It would be like that if it were (∂x/∂x)ψ.
 
Altabeh said:
But I got the right answer. Let's make it look better: [tex]\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{{\partial^2} (x\psi)}{\partial{x^2}}=\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{{\partial}}{\partial{x}}\left(\frac{{\partial} (x\psi)}{\partial{x}}\right)[/tex]. Now use the simple rule (xy)'=x'y+y'x and see what happens.
AB

if i use the product rule on both sides then i just get the same thing on both sides. meaning i just have 0? or have i done that wrong?

The answer quoted for this problem is [tex]\frac{\hbar^2}{m}\frac{\partial}{\partial{x}}[/tex]
 
8614smith said:
if i use the product rule on both sides then i just get the same thing on both sides. meaning i just have 0? or have i done that wrong?

The answer quoted for this problem is [tex]\frac{\hbar^2}{m}\frac{\partial}{\partial{x}}[/tex]

It means that you have done it right. Let's take the final step:

[tex]\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{{\partial^2} (x\psi)}{\partial{x^2}}=<br /> \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{{\partial}}{\partial{x}}\left(\frac{{\partial} (x\psi)}{\partial{x}}\right)=<br /> \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{{\partial}}{\partial{x}}\left(\frac{{\partial} (x)}{\partial{x}}\psi+x\frac{{\partial} (\psi)}{\partial{x}}\right)=<br /> \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{{\partial}}{\partial{x}}\left(\psi+x\frac{{\partial} (\psi)}{\partial{x}}\right)[/tex]. So we ended up getting the expression in the parenthesis of desired answer. You see it, right?!

AB
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
997
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K