"Strange contradiction" that Maxwell found and resolved

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around a historical contradiction identified by James Clerk Maxwell in the context of his equations for electricity and magnetism. Participants explore the nature of this contradiction, its implications for electromagnetic wave propagation, and the modifications Maxwell made to resolve it. The conversation includes references to theoretical concepts, historical context, and mathematical formulations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references Banesh Hoffmann's account of Maxwell's intuition leading to a new set of equations that resolved a contradiction in the theory of electricity and magnetism.
  • Another participant speculates that the contradiction might relate to Newton's hypothetical aether and the concept of intrinsic impedance in free space, which is necessary for electromagnetic wave propagation.
  • A different participant notes that adding the dependence of the magnetic field on the time variation of the electric field is essential for deriving the electromagnetic wave equation, questioning the nature of the contradiction if that term is omitted.
  • Several participants point to external sources, including Wikipedia and the Feynman lectures, suggesting that Maxwell's displacement current is crucial for the self-consistency of the equations.
  • One participant presents a mathematical argument indicating that a specific equation contradicts the continuity equation, implying a lack of consistency without Maxwell's added term.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various hypotheses regarding the nature of the contradiction and the necessary modifications to Maxwell's equations. There is no consensus on the exact nature of the contradiction or the implications of Maxwell's corrections, indicating multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference external sources and mathematical formulations, but the discussion does not resolve the underlying assumptions or definitions related to the contradiction. The implications of Maxwell's modifications are also not fully explored.

Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,047
Reaction score
786
In "The Strange Story of the Quantum", Banesh Hoffmann writes:

Not content with translating Faraday’s ideas into mathematical form. Maxwell went on to develop the mathematical consequences of the theory and to extend its realm. Soon he came to a contradiction. Evidently all was not well with the theory, but what the remedy might be was not easy to determine. Various scientists sought for a cure, among them Maxwell himself. So refined and mathematical had the theory of electricity and magnetism become by now that when Max well arrived at a cure by sheer intuition based upon most unreliable analogies, he produced a group of equations differing but slightly in external form from the old equations. But not only did the new equations remove the contradiction, they also carried a significant new implication. They required that there should exist such, things as electromagnetic waves, that these waves should move with the speed of light, and that they should have all the other major known physical properties of light.

What was that contradiction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Swamp Thing said:
What was that contradiction?
I would guess it had to do with Newtons hypothetical aether, and free space having an intrinsic impedance. That concept was needed before EM wave propagation could be considered.
 
Wikipedia suggests that what he did was add the dependence of the magnetic field on the time variation of the electric field, which is definitely a necessary component of the derivation of the EM wave equation.

I'm not sure what the contradiction would be from leaving that term out.
 
Perhaps the "contradiction" is what is explained here in the section "Maxwell’s Correction to the Laws of Electricity and Magnetism":
1710680089973.png


1710680357398.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK, Swamp Thing and Ibix
The Feynman lectures also explain it quite well. Without the term that Maxwell added (called Maxwell's displacement current), the equations are not self consistent.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby and Swamp Thing
The equation,
$$\nabla\times{\bf H}=4\pi{\bf j}/c$$,
contradicts the continuity equation because,
$$\nabla\cdot(\nabla\times{\bf H})=(4\pi/c)\nabla\cdot{\bf j}=-4(\pi/c)\partial_t\rho\neq 0$$.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Spinnor and Ibix

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K