String theory in dimensions other than 10

crackjack
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
I have a few questions on non-critical string theory...

terminology:
1: Are "Gepner models" a subset of non-critical string theory?

technical:
2: Given a set of spectrum, are there ways to construct a non-critical string theory with enough symmetries so that the CFT becomes minimal and hence completely solvable?
3: Given a non-critical string theory (say, in d-dimensions with d<10) can one come up with an equivalent (in all sense of the word) description in terms of some compactified (to the same d-dimensions) critical string theory?

May be some introductory lecture(s) with references citing original work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can answer those...

crackjack said:
1: Are "Gepner models" a subset of non-critical string theory?
Yes and no... Gepner models refers to constructions where the internal CFT is represented by combinations of (superconformal) minimal models. If the total central charge c-hat equals 9, then this will yield a critical string theory, otherwise not.


crackjack said:
Given a set of spectrum, are there ways to construct a non-critical string theory with enough symmetries so that the CFT becomes minimal and hence completely solvable?
Yes - if the CFT is minimal model, then the theory is completely solvable, as it can be represented by a matrix model and is governed by integrable systems. This has been heavily investigated around 1990.

crackjack said:
Given a non-critical string theory (say, in d-dimensions with d<10) can one come up with an equivalent (in all sense of the word) description in terms of some compactified (to the same d-dimensions) critical string theory?
Along the lines of thought discussed so far, not that I would know of. In non-critical strings, due to the non-cancellation of the Virasoro anomaly, the Liouville mode of the 2d metric becomes dynamical (ie, does not decouple). This is very different from any critical string theory.

But there are other notions of non-critical strings, like the strongly coupled theory in 6d, but those are constructed differently; they are not obtained from a world-sheet CFT but from decoupling limits of critical strings.


crackjack said:
May be some introductory lecture(s) with references citing original work?

This is a good review about d<1 strings:
http://www-spires.dur.ac.uk/cgi-bin/spiface/hep/www?r=PUPT-1217
See also e.g
http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/9110041
 
Last edited by a moderator:
suprised said:
Yes and no... Gepner models refers to constructions where the internal CFT is represented by combinations of (superconformal) minimal models. If the total central charge c-hat equals 9, then this will yield a critical string theory, otherwise not.
I will take it as "Gepner models with c \neq 9 are subsets of non-critical string theories"

suprised said:
In non-critical strings, due to the non-cancellation of the Virasoro anomaly, the Liouville mode of the 2d metric becomes dynamical (ie, does not decouple). This is very different from any critical string theory.
A clarification: Are you referring to the trace anomaly of stress tensor, when you say Virasoro anomaly?
Asking this because I thought the other anomaly (Weyl) is canceled in both critical & non-critical strings. In addition, cancellation of Weyl anomaly automatically cancels the trace anomaly in critical strings. Seems like this automatic cancellation does not hold for non-critical strings?

suprised said:
Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
crackjack said:
I will take it as "Gepner models with c \neq 9 are subsets of non-critical string theories"
yes.

crackjack said:
A clarification: Are you referring to the trace anomaly of stress tensor, when you say Virasoro anomaly?
yes!

Happy Holidays!
 
Thanks surprised, and wish you a very good year ahead!
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...

Similar threads

Back
Top