Structure of elements of the unitary group

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Any element g in the unitary group can be represented as s * D * s^-1, where D is a diagonal matrix and s is a unitary matrix. The defining property of a unitary matrix is that its Hermitian conjugate equals its inverse. This representation stems from a fundamental theorem in linear algebra, which asserts that every unitary matrix is diagonalizable. Resources such as linear algebra textbooks or online articles can provide further insights into this theorem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of unitary matrices and their properties
  • Familiarity with Hermitian conjugates
  • Knowledge of diagonal matrices
  • Basic concepts of linear algebra, particularly diagonalization
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the theorem on diagonalization of unitary matrices in linear algebra
  • Explore the properties of Hermitian matrices and their implications
  • Research the relationship between unitary matrices and basis transformations
  • Examine examples of diagonal matrices in the context of unitary transformations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone studying linear algebra, particularly those interested in the properties and applications of unitary matrices.

FunkyDwarf
Messages
481
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I'm having a massive brain freeze here trying to show that for any element g in the unitary group you can always represent it as s*some diagonal matrix*s^-1. The only requirement for an element to be unitary is that its hermitian conjugate is its inverse correct? Any hints/help would be appreciated!

Cheers
-G
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah i think i see what youre saying, its kind of a basis transformation thing? I sort of understand that (not in a way to provide a proper proof though) but is there a way to arrive at that relation just from the strict definition of a unitary matrix?

Cheers
-G
 
It inevitably follows from a theorem in Linear algebra that states every unitary matrix is diagonalizable. You can probably find it in some L(Alg) textbook or alternatively you can simply google that statement.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
893
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K