Structure of elements of the unitary group

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the representation of elements in the unitary group, specifically whether any element can be expressed as a product of a diagonal matrix and its inverse. Participants explore the definitions and properties of unitary matrices, seeking clarification and proof related to their diagonalizability.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to represent any element of the unitary group as a product involving a diagonal matrix and its inverse, referencing the definition of unitary matrices.
  • Another participant suggests consulting a Wikipedia page for equivalent definitions of unitary matrices that may provide insights into diagonal matrices.
  • A later reply indicates that a theorem in linear algebra states that every unitary matrix is diagonalizable, suggesting that this may lead to the desired representation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants have not reached a consensus on the proof or method to show the representation of unitary matrices, and multiple viewpoints regarding the approach remain present.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the definitions of unitary matrices and diagonalizability are not fully explored, and the discussion does not resolve the specific steps needed to arrive at the proposed representation.

FunkyDwarf
Messages
481
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I'm having a massive brain freeze here trying to show that for any element g in the unitary group you can always represent it as s*some diagonal matrix*s^-1. The only requirement for an element to be unitary is that its hermitian conjugate is its inverse correct? Any hints/help would be appreciated!

Cheers
-G
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah i think i see what youre saying, its kind of a basis transformation thing? I sort of understand that (not in a way to provide a proper proof though) but is there a way to arrive at that relation just from the strict definition of a unitary matrix?

Cheers
-G
 
It inevitably follows from a theorem in Linear algebra that states every unitary matrix is diagonalizable. You can probably find it in some L(Alg) textbook or alternatively you can simply google that statement.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K