Struggling with Baker-Campbell-Haussdorf-like formulas

  • Thread starter Thread starter luisgml_2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formulas
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 4K views
luisgml_2000
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have been asked to prove [tex]e^{\alpha a}f(a,a^\dagger)e^{-\alpha a}=f(a,a^\dagger+\alpha)[/tex], where [tex]a[/tex] and [tex]a^\dagger[/tex] represent the annihilation and creation operators of the quantum harmonic oscillator, respectively.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The only thing I have done is to use the Hadamard Lemma (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff_formula). Any ideas will be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gabbagabbahey said:
That seems like a good place to start...what do you get when you do that?

I get

[tex]e^{\alpha a}f(a,a^\dagger)e^{-\alpha a}=f(a,a^\dagger)+\frac{\alpha}{1!}[a,f(a,a^\dagger)]+\frac{\alpha^2}{2!}[a,[a,f(a,a^\dagger)]]+\ldots[/tex]

but I don't know what to do next.
 
It seems that I have to apply some kind of Taylor expansion but I'm not sure on how to do this.
 
Hint: Consider [itex]f(a,a^{\dagger})=a^{\dagger}[/itex] and [itex]f(a,a^{\dagger})=a[/itex]...what do these considerations tell you about the unitary transformation [itex]f(a,a^{\dagger})\to e^{\alpha a}f(a,a^{\dagger})e^{-\alpha a}[/itex]?
 
Last edited:
[tex] e^{\alpha a}a^\dagger e^{-\alpha a}=a^\dagger+\frac{\alpha}{1!}[a,a^\dagger]+\frac{\alpha^2}{2!}[a,[a,a^\dagger]]+\ldots=a^\dagger+\frac{\alpha}{1!}=\alpha+a^\dagger[/tex]

[tex] e^{\alpha a}a e^{-\alpha a}=a+\frac{\alpha}{1!}[a,a]+\frac{\alpha^2}{2!}[a,[a,a]]+\ldots=a[/tex]

In this sense the formula seems to be working fine.

Does it mean that the unitary transformation [itex]f(a,a^{\dagger})\to e^{\alpha a}f(a,a^{\dagger})e^{-\alpha a}[/itex] represents a displacement of [itex]\alpha[/itex] in the second argument of [itex]f[/itex]?
 
Yes, exactly. Under the transformation [itex]f(a,a^{\dagger})\to e^{\alpha a}f(a,a^{\dagger})e^{-\alpha a}[/itex], you have [itex]a\to a[/itex] and [itex]a^{\dagger}\to a^{\dagger}+\alpha[/itex] and hence [itex]f(a,a^{\dagger})\to f(a,a^{\dagger}+\alpha)[/itex]...nice and simple, no Taylor series needed:smile:
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Yes, exactly. Under the transformation [itex]f(a,a^{\dagger})\to e^{\alpha a}f(a,a^{\dagger})e^{-\alpha a}[/itex], you have [itex]a\to a[/itex] and [itex]a^{\dagger}\to a^{\dagger}+\alpha[/itex] and hence [itex]f(a,a^{\dagger})\to f(a,a^{\dagger}+\alpha)[/itex]...nice and simple, no Taylor series needed:smile:

Thanks a lot, I think I finally understand it!