Stuck on Quantum Mechanics Potential Steps Problem?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving potential steps and wave functions. The original poster is struggling with part (f) of the question after successfully addressing parts (d) and (e). There is a focus on the behavior of wave amplitudes and the implications of boundary conditions in different regions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between wave numbers in different regions and the implications of boundary conditions. There are questions about the equality of wave numbers and the conditions imposed by Schrödinger's equation.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring the implications of their calculations and assumptions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the application of Schrödinger's equation, and there is an ongoing examination of the conditions that arise from the wave functions.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the fixed energy of the particle and the potential differences in the regions affecting the wave numbers. The discussion reflects uncertainty about specific assumptions and the need for explicit calculations to clarify relationships between variables.

Martin89
Messages
25
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


QM.png


The Attempt at a Solution



20180526_165635.jpg

[/B]
Hi All,

I'm having trouble answering part (f) of the above question. I have managed parts (d) and (e) fine but am not sure how to proceed with part (f). I am pretty sure that the amplitude of the reflected wave in region 1 will be zero but I don't know how to show it.

Thanks in advance for any help!
 

Attachments

  • QM.png
    QM.png
    55.1 KB · Views: 1,475
  • 20180526_165635.jpg
    20180526_165635.jpg
    18.6 KB · Views: 928
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solutions to (d) and (e) look correct, except for one small detail--I can't tell if the right-hands side of your last equation is ##k_1 Te^{ik_1 L}## or ##k_2 Te^{ik_2 L}##. Obviously, one is correct and one is not. :)

If ##Lk_2 = n \pi##, then ##e^{iLk_2} = e^{-iLk_2} = \pm 1##. This should allow you to rewrite the boundary conditions at ##x = L## in a form that's easier to compare to the boundary conditions at ##x = 0##---in fact, you should be able to eliminate ##C## and ##D## from the equations involving ##A## and ##B## altogether (although ##T## will still be present). If you can get this far, it should be pretty clear what to do next. (Hint: your intuition is correct. ;))
 
VKint said:
Your solutions to (d) and (e) look correct, except for one small detail--I can't tell if the right-hands side of your last equation is ##k_1 Te^{ik_1 L}## or ##k_2 Te^{ik_2 L}##. Obviously, one is correct and one is not. :)

If ##Lk_2 = n \pi##, then ##e^{iLk_2} = e^{-iLk_2} = \pm 1##. This should allow you to rewrite the boundary conditions at ##x = L## in a form that's easier to compare to the boundary conditions at ##x = 0##---in fact, you should be able to eliminate ##C## and ##D## from the equations involving ##A## and ##B## altogether (although ##T## will still be present). If you can get this far, it should be pretty clear what to do next. (Hint: your intuition is correct. ;))
20180527_233656.jpg


Thanks for the reply! I think I'm still missing something. Should k1 = k3 at x=0 or something?
 

Attachments

  • 20180527_233656.jpg
    20180527_233656.jpg
    20.6 KB · Views: 917
Martin89 said:
View attachment 226253

Thanks for the reply! I think I'm still missing something. Should k1 = k3 at x=0 or something?
You have not yet imposed that the wave functions must satisfy Schrödinger's equation. Impose that in regions I and III, what does that tell you about k1 and k3? (note that the energy of the particle is fixed and is assigned the value E in the question)
 
Last edited:
nrqed said:
You have not yet imposed that the wave functions must satisfy Schrödinger's equation. Impose that in regions I and II, what does that tell you about k1 and k3? (note that the energy of the particle is fixed and is assigned the value E in the question)

I've done as you said but I'm not sure what it shows me. K1 and K2 are different due to the potential in region 2. Looking at the problem physically, the Schrödinger equation must be identical in regions 1 and 3, and therefore K1=K3. Is this a correct assumption?
 
Martin89 said:
I've done as you said but I'm not sure what it shows me. K1 and K2 are different due to the potential in region 2. Looking at the problem physically, the Schrödinger equation must be identical in regions 1 and 3, and therefore K1=K3. Is this a correct assumption?
Well, it would be better to show things explicitly. What condition do you get when you plug in the wave function of region I into Schrödinger's equation?
 
nrqed said:
Well, it would be better to show things explicitly. What condition do you get when you plug in the wave function of region I into Schrödinger's equation?
20180528_144838.jpg


That is the condition for K1. The expression for K3 should be identical right?
 

Attachments

  • 20180528_144838.jpg
    20180528_144838.jpg
    39.9 KB · Views: 909
Martin89 said:
View attachment 226294

That is the condition for K1. The expression for K3 should be identical right?

do the calculation...the answer will pop right out.
 
Dr Transport said:
do the calculation...the answer will pop right out.

Ok so I've done the calculation and K1 does indeed equal K3. Thanks guys!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K