Study the action in a one-dimensional movement (Hamilton Principle)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the Hamilton Principle to study one-dimensional motion, specifically deriving the trajectory of a particle using the Lagrangian mechanics. The trajectory is expressed as ##x(t)=\frac{1}{2} gt^2+ut##, and the action is analyzed through the variational principle. The user encountered difficulties in proving that the real trajectory minimizes the action, particularly with the integral ##g\displaystyle\int_{0}^{T}{(t\dot\alpha(t)-\alpha(t))dt}##. After identifying a sign error in the Lagrangian, the user successfully confirmed that ##\delta S=\frac{1}{2}\displaystyle\int_{0}^{T}{\dot\alpha^2(t)dt}##, validating the extremal action condition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics and the Hamilton Principle
  • Familiarity with variational calculus and integral calculus
  • Knowledge of LaTeX for mathematical formatting
  • Basic concepts of classical mechanics, including kinetic and potential energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced topics in Lagrangian mechanics, focusing on constraints and generalized coordinates
  • Study integration techniques, particularly integration by parts, in the context of variational calculus
  • Learn about the implications of the Hamiltonian formulation in classical mechanics
  • Investigate applications of the Hamilton Principle in different physical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, as well as researchers interested in variational principles and their applications in motion analysis.

alex23
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Study the action (in the sense of Hamilton) for the one-dimensional movement of a particle of mass 1 in a field of constant forces and prove that it reaches a minimum for the real trajectory of the particle.
Relevant Equations
##L=T-V##
##T=\frac{1}{2}m\dot x^2##
##V=-mgx##
Action: ##S=\int{L(t,x,\dot x)dt}##
Using the Lagrangian of the system I reached that ##x(t)=\frac{1}{2} gt^2+ut ## is the real trajectory of the particle.
After that, I consider different trajectories: ##x(\alpha,t) = x(t) + \alpha(t)## with ##\alpha(t)## being an arbitrary function of t expect for the conditions ##\alpha(0)=\alpha(T)=0##, where ##T## is the final time of the movement. This way ##x(\alpha,t)## shows a family of trajectories that start and end in the same points as the real trajectory ##x(t)##.
Now, the problem asks me to study the action and prove that the real trajectory makes the action an extremal (in this case a minimum). For that, I calculated the variance of ##S: \delta S= S(\alpha) - S(0)##.
To do that I calculated the Lagrangian of both ##x(\alpha,t)## and ##x(0,t)## and introduced them both to calculate ##S(\alpha)## and ##S(0)## and introduce them in the formula above. Doing that I reached this:
$$ \displaystyle\int_{0}^{T}{[\frac{1}{2}(gt+u+\dot \alpha(t))^2 -g(\frac{1}{2}gt^2+ut+\alpha(t))]dt} - \displaystyle\int_{0}^{T}{[\frac{1}{2}(g^2t^2+u^2+2ugt)-(\frac{1}{2}g^2t^2+ugt)]dt} $$
Where ##\dot\alpha(t)## is used to denote the total time derivate of ##\alpha(t)##, so ##\dot\alpha(t)=\frac{d\alpha(t)}{dt}##.
After expanding the integral and combining them I reached to this:
$$ \displaystyle\int_{0}^{T}{(\frac{1}{2}\dot\alpha^2(t)+gt\dot\alpha(t)+u\dot\alpha(t)-g\dot\alpha(t))dt} $$
This leaves me with 3 integrals, the first:
##\frac{1}{2}\displaystyle\int_{0}^{T}{\dot\alpha^2(t)dt}##, which is always positive, which would make it so it had a minimum in ##\alpha=0## and hence proving that the real trajectory makes the action S an extremal.
The second integral:
##u\displaystyle\int_{0}^{T}{\dot\alpha(t)dt}=u[\alpha(T)-\alpha(0)]=0##, which would make it so it didn't contribute.
And the third integral and the reason for my problems:
##g\displaystyle\int_{0}^{T}{(t\dot\alpha(t)-\alpha(t))dt}##, which I can't seem to make 0 since I think it would not be 0 in the general case and I can't see where I was mistaken before to make this integral appear.
I know for a fact that the objectives is to reach that ##\delta S=S(\alpha)-S(0)=\frac{1}{2}\displaystyle\int_{0}^{T}{\dot\alpha^2(t)}##. And making the argument I made above would be sufficient to solve the problem.
I don't think the mistakes is after expanding and simplifying the integrals, so the error should come from before that, but I can't seem to locate where I was mistaken. Any help pointing where the mistake is would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance!

Edit: I edited the post to properly format everything in LaTeX since I didn't know it was supported by the forum, hopefully it makes it easier to read! And sorry for the inconvenience.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you just have a careless sign error (easy to do). There are two negative signs that contribute to the ##mgx## term in the Lagrangian. One negative sign is the one in ##L = T-V## and the other is in ##V = -mgx##.

Otherwise, your work looks good to me.

You might think about doing integration by parts for ##\int t \dot \alpha dt##

Thanks for using LaTex!
 
TSny said:
I think you just have a careless sign error (easy to do). There are two negative signs that contribute to the ##mgx## term in the Lagrangian. One negative sign is the one in ##L = T-V## and the other is in ##V = -mgx##.

Otherwise, your work looks good to me.

You might think about doing integration by parts for ##\int t \dot \alpha dt##

Thanks for using LaTex!
You are absolutely right, I had a sign error in the Lagrangian. After fixing that and doing the integration by parts as you suggested I managed to get ##\delta S=\frac{1}{2}\displaystyle\int_{0}^{T}{\dot\alpha^2(t)dt}## as I as supposed to.
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K