Stunning Telescope Photo of Vega Captured with 130mm Eyepiece - See the Beauty!

  • Context: Stargazing 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bruha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photo Telescope
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around astrophotography, specifically focusing on capturing images of the star Vega using a telescope and mobile camera. Participants share their experiences, techniques, and challenges related to photographing celestial objects, while also addressing issues such as camera shake and equipment stability.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that camera shake may be caused by pressing the shutter release and recommend using a delay feature to minimize movement.
  • Others emphasize the importance of a stable mount for astrophotography, noting that a significant portion of successful images relies on stability.
  • A participant mentions the challenges of achieving high-quality images, comparing personal photos to professional images from telescopes like Hubble.
  • There are discussions about the differences in techniques required for imaging various celestial objects, such as planets versus nebulas.
  • Some participants share their own experiences with astrophotography, including the need for specialized equipment and the potential costs involved.
  • One participant notes that light pollution limits their ability to observe and photograph certain celestial objects from their location.
  • Another participant shares their experience of capturing the Orion Nebula under light-polluted skies, highlighting the need for good equipment and timing.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of equipment stability and the challenges posed by light pollution. However, there are multiple competing views regarding the best techniques for astrophotography and the types of objects that can be effectively imaged.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the best practices for astrophotography, and there are unresolved questions regarding the specific equipment and techniques that would yield the best results in light-polluted areas.

Who May Find This Useful

Astronomy enthusiasts, amateur astrophotographers, and individuals interested in improving their skills in capturing celestial images may find this discussion beneficial.

  • #31
bruha said:
thank you for your advise...now I got webcam adpter as you reccomended , so I hope it will getting better

that's good :smile:
when it's hooked up to your laptop, you should be able to see a live view and then it should be easy to get a good focus

bruha said:
(taking such photo through mobile camera is really quite frustrating..)

indeed ... quite difficult to get reasonable results

bruha said:
-I have 130 x 700 mm refractor
OK :smile: ... what is it's make and model so I can have a look online at its specifications
Dave
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
Hello yes I can drive out of town to darker area..it is not a problem.
Concerning my equipment now I have Newton cca 700x 130 mm , webcam eyepce adapter ,(but it is needs for taking out.of home suitable notebook ...) and just mobile camera. it is all
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #33
And model of telescope I l send when will be home . I got eyepiece 20 12 and 4 mm and I bough additinaly 6mm as with 4mm I was not able to focuse properly..
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #34
Hello,
yesterday I made some pics of moon by webcam scope adapter (attached) -I think one problem is moon movement (webcam imaging has just one magnification) and not so good resolution of webcam viewer.. If you have some experiences with this technique I will appreciate...
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    13.3 KB · Views: 425
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    13.8 KB · Views: 413
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    13.4 KB · Views: 465
  • 4.jpg
    4.jpg
    12 KB · Views: 454
  • 5.jpg
    5.jpg
    12.1 KB · Views: 439
  • 6.jpg
    6.jpg
    16.8 KB · Views: 508
  • 7.jpg
    7.jpg
    10 KB · Views: 452
  • 8.jpg
    8.jpg
    20 KB · Views: 478
  • #35
bruha said:
-I think one problem is moon movement
Moon movement is negligible over the sort of exposure time you will be using but camera , telescope shake could be responsible ( particluarly as the blur seems to be in the vertical direction and it looks like the pictures are in the right orientation. If you can image a star, the shape of the trail will give you a better idea of the nature of the spurious movement. On my DSLR the mirror lifting causes a massive wiggle so I use the 3s delay feature. If you are operating the shutter with your finger then you can expect some movement. Try using the shutter delay with hands off. What exposure times are you using?
I have no experience of smart phone imaging but my comments apply in general.
 
  • #36
sophiecentaur said:
bruha said:
Hello,
yesterday I made some pics of moon by webcam scope adapter (attached) -I think one problem is moon movement (webcam imaging has just one magnification) and not so good resolution of webcam viewer.. If you have some experiences with this technique I will appreciate...
I have no experience of smart phone imaging but my comments apply in general.
Those pictures are taken with a webcam, no lens on the webcam or eyepiece, and not touching the scope, right?

Yes, controlling magnification in that situation is difficult and the moon is big. You might try Saturn...

For the moon, you would probably want a focal reducer you can screw onto the adapter, which can cut the magnification by half. Next step: stacking...
http://www.astronomie.be/registax/

You can also try taking different sections of the moon and assembling a mosaic. Here's an early attempt of mine at a 2x3 mosaic, with a webcam;

http://www.russsscope.net/images/moon-12-29-06.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
  • #37
Hi
thank you for advise and links... I will try (unfortunately Saturn at this time from my position is quite difficult to catch)..
 
  • #38
russ_watters said:
Here's an early attempt of mine at a 2x3 mosaic, with a webcam;
That's nice. I bet you were quite pleased with it. And the money you saved by not buying a sensor with six times the area!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K