Stupid Tabular Method for Integration by parts

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 7K views
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
Is this the correct way to use the Tabular Method for
[tex]\int x^2e^{-5x}dx[/tex]


repeated diff:

[tex]x^2[/tex]

[tex]2x[/tex]

[tex]2[/tex]


repeated Integration:

[tex]e^{-5x}[/tex]

[tex]-\frac{1}{5}e^{-5x}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{25}e^{-5x}[/tex]

[tex]-\frac{1}{125}e^{-5x}[/tex]


=[tex]-\frac{x^2}{5}e^{-5x}+\frac{2x}{25}e^{-5x}+\frac{2}{125}e^{-5x}+C[/tex]

I hate this.

Casey
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes but the signs of the 2nd/3rd terms are wrong.

You should write out the table and include the alternating +/-

writing it out this way might be easier to do since all you do is read across to find the terms
Code:
          [tex]e^{-5x}[/tex]
+   [tex]x^2[/tex]   [tex]\frac{-e^{-5x}}{5}[/tex]

-   [tex]2x[/tex]   [tex]\frac{e^{-5x}}{25}[/tex]
 
Then I clearly have no idea what I am doing. I am looking at the tabular method in my book, and from what i have read I take the diagonal product of x^2*(-1/5)e^{-5x} and then ADD it to the next product of 2x*(1/25)e^{-5x} and now subtract the product of 2*(-1/125)e^{-5x}

Am I off on all of them by a step?
 
OHHHH...I get it ...form the product then multiply by +1 or -1 THEN add all of the terms...that makes sense. so it is

[tex]-\frac{x^2}{5}e^{-5x}-\frac{2x}{25}e^{-5x}-\frac{2}{125}e^{-5x}+C[/tex]

Casey