Subgroup proof - is this even true?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 1K views
1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41

Homework Statement



Prove that G cannot have a subgroup H with |H| = n - 1, where n = |G| > 2.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Counter-example, the multiplicative group R and its subgroup, multiplicative group R+. Or, the additive group Z, and its subgroup of integer multiples of 2. What am I missing here? I think this is trivial for finite groups, but they don't say finite groups, they don't say anything.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1MileCrash said:

Homework Statement



Prove that G cannot have a subgroup H with |H| = n - 1, where n = |G| > 2.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Counter-example, the multiplicative group R and its subgroup, multiplicative group R+. Or, the additive group Z, and its subgroup of integer multiples of 2. What am I missing here? I think this is trivial for finite groups, but they don't say finite groups, they don't say anything.

Saying n=|G| implies that the group is finite and has order n. Otherwise |H| = n - 1 wouldn't make much sense.