Subgroups and prime order elements

  • Thread starter Thread starter wakko101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Prime
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a group theory problem concerning the conditions under which a set of elements of a group, specifically those of a certain order, can form a subgroup. The original poster questions why the integer n must be prime if the set H, consisting of elements of order n along with the identity, forms a subgroup of G.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the implications of the order of elements in relation to subgroup formation and questions whether the lack of other divisors of the group order necessitates that n is prime. Other participants provide counterexamples and challenge the assumptions made regarding the order of elements.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem, with some providing counterexamples to the original poster's assertion. There is an ongoing examination of the reasoning behind the necessity for n to be prime, with suggestions for proof techniques being introduced.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of specific examples, such as integers modulo 12, which may not align with the original poster's assumptions about subgroup properties. The discussion reflects a mix of perspectives on the nature of group elements and their orders.

wakko101
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
The question:

Let n > 1 be a fixed integer and let G be a group. If the set H = {x in G : |x| = n} together with the identity forms a subgroup of G, what can be said about n?

I know that n must be prime, but I can't figure out why that would be. The elements of h only have order 1 or n and no others and the order of an element divides the order of the (sub)group. Are we making the assumption that since there are no other divisors of the group order, n must be prime? Or is it something else...

Any insight would be appreciated.

Cheers,
W. =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No - take integers modulo 12 (under addition) with n=4. {0,3,6,9} is a subgroup.
 
Eynstone said:
No - take integers modulo 12 (under addition) with n=4. {0,3,6,9} is a subgroup.

Is this supposed to be a counterexample? Did you account for the fact that |6|=2 since 6+6=0?
 
wakko101 said:
The question:

Let n > 1 be a fixed integer and let G be a group. If the set H = {x in G : |x| = n} together with the identity forms a subgroup of G, what can be said about n?

I know that n must be prime, but I can't figure out why that would be. The elements of h only have order 1 or n and no others and the order of an element divides the order of the (sub)group. Are we making the assumption that since there are no other divisors of the group order, n must be prime? Or is it something else...

Your intuition about n being prime is correct. As for your assumption question --- it is not an assumption; it is what you have to prove!

Try a proof by contradiction. That is, suppose n = ab with a>1 and b>1. Now consider any element h in H. Since |h|=n=ab, we have [itex]h^{ab}=(h^a)^b[/itex]. Can you see how to get a contradiction out of this?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K