Subspaces in Vector Spaces over F2

  • Thread starter Thread starter karnten07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspace
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around vector spaces over the field F2, which consists of the elements {0, 1}. Participants are exploring the properties of subsets of vector spaces, particularly focusing on the conditions that define a subspace.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand the requirements for a subset W of a vector space V to be considered a subspace, particularly questioning the necessity of closure under scalar multiplication.
  • There are inquiries about the implications of V being a vector space over F2, specifically regarding the scalars involved.
  • Some participants are discussing the subsets of F2^2 and questioning which of these subsets qualify as subspaces.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants seeking clarification on vector space definitions and properties. Some guidance has been provided regarding the nature of scalars in F2, and there is an exploration of the implications of these properties on the subsets being analyzed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions and properties of vector spaces over finite fields, particularly F2, and the implications of these properties on the subsets of the vector space F2^2. There is a recognition of the need to clarify foundational concepts related to vector spaces.

karnten07
Messages
206
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let (F2) ={0,1} denote the field with 2 elements.

i) Let V be a vector space over (F2) . Show that every non empty subset W of V which is closed under addition is a subspace of V.

ii) Write down all subsets of the vector space (F2)^2 over (F2) and underline those subsets which are subspaces.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



For i.) do i need to show that it is closed under scalar multiplication also? I don't understand how it is because for example 6x1=6 which is not of F2??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
To show that W is a subspace of V, it suffices to show that for two scalars in your field, a and b, and two vectors in W, v and w, av + bw is in W.

6 x 1 = 6 is certainly not in F2, but it is in V (assuming V is R).

I think your confusion is that you're letting V = F2.
 
e(ho0n3 said:
To show that W is a subspace of V, it suffices to show that for two scalars in your field, a and b, and two vectors in W, v and w, av + bw is in W.

6 x 1 = 6 is certainly not in F2, but it is in V (assuming V is R).

I think your confusion is that you're letting V = F2.

Yes you are right, that's what i was kind of thinking. Could anyone explain to me what it means that V is a vector space over F2? please.
 
For part ii.) i have that F2^2 = {(0,0),(0,1),(1,0),(1,1)}

So i assume that 0,0 is a subspace because it is the zero subspace. Do i say that (0,1) is a subspace also as this is the vector space of F2 itself?? Are (1,0) and (1,1) subspaces also?
 
karnten07 said:
Yes you are right, that's what i was kind of thinking. Could anyone explain to me what it means that V is a vector space over F2? please.

Oh does it mean that the scalars that can be applied are only the two elements 0 and 1 of F2?
 
e(ho0n3 said:
It seems to me that you have very little knowledge of what vector spaces are. Perhaps this will help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_space.

Yes, i have read about vector spaces and it does seem to me that in this case the vector space is over F2 and F2 only consists of 2 elements. So does this mean only 0 and 1 are the scalars that this vector space deals with, so to speak??
 
Yes, 0 and 1 are the only allowed scalars. As long as F2 is a field, the vector space over it is well-defined.
 
e(ho0n3 said:
Yes, 0 and 1 are the only allowed scalars. As long as F2 is a field, the vector space over it is well-defined.

Great, thanks for clearing that up.
 
  • #10
So since 0 and 1 are the only scalars used on V, then i could simultaneously prove it is closed under scalar multiplication and show the existence of a multiplicative identity element (1).
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K