Suggest a book for this statics course (exams attached)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around seeking book recommendations for a statics course, with a focus on understanding the theoretical aspects of the subject. Participants express concerns about the teaching approach, which emphasizes graphical and algebraic problem-solving over vector methods.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the professor's preference for solving problems graphically and algebraically rather than using vectors, which raises questions about the clarity of this approach.
  • Another participant suggests that any mechanics book should suffice for statics, and mentions the potential benefit of engineering books on the topic.
  • There is a discussion about the interpretation of the professor's instructions, with some participants suggesting that he wants students to adopt an engineering mindset focused on sketches and diagrams.
  • Concerns are raised about the lack of theoretical coverage in the course, making it difficult for the original poster to know what to study.
  • One participant shares a specific book recommendation that aligns with the content of the exams provided by the original poster.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the professor's teaching methods and the best approach to learning statics. There is no consensus on the most effective resources or methods to adopt, and multiple perspectives on the interpretation of the professor's instructions remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the course has not covered much theory and that certain parts of the syllabus have been skipped, contributing to the original poster's confusion about what to learn.

Mépris
Messages
847
Reaction score
11
Hi,

I'm currently studying physics in Europe, and am in some kind of "statics" course. It's a little unclear, as the course name is probably loosely translated from German, and the teacher didn't have any English books to recommend.

He's a great prof, but our classes are almost exclusively him going through a long problem set he assigned to us at the beginning of the semester. It's been that way for around 2.5 months, and we only have class with him once per week.

I badly need to get a book with which I can better understand the theory of what we're doing. He told us that he'd prefer we not use vectors to solve the problems, and instead, do them "graphically" (and algebraically) as that would help build a better intuition for things.

I asked him if I could upload some old exams on a forum to get some book recommendations, and he said it was OK. I've attached them to the post.

Your help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Mépris said:
I badly need to get a book with which I can better understand the theory of what we're doing. He told us that he'd prefer we not use vectors to solve the problems, and instead, do them "graphically" (and algebraically) as that would help build a better intuition for things.

I don't understand that. Vectors are geometric and analytic. Does he want you to break up each equation into its parts on each plane—which is the same as using vectors...

Statics is just a branch of mechanics, so any mechanics book should be appropriate. There are also engineering books on the topic you might find beneficial.
 
Sorry, I wasn't clear enough. If I recall correctly, he said that there were multiple ways to solve the problems, one of which being using the cross products, and he said he preferred the other way.

The attachments are still pending approval, so I've uploaded the files on an external host. Below is the link to two past exams. Based on this, could you/anyone else reading this, suggest appropriate books? It's very tricky for me because my understanding of the course is very shallow. We haven't covered much theory and he skips certain parts of the syllabus, so I can't really know what to learn!

https://www.mediafire.com/folder/fsiri7pzp61ie/statics
 
Mépris said:
I badly need to get a book with which I can better understand the theory of what we're doing. He told us that he'd prefer we not use vectors to solve the problems, and instead, do them "graphically" (and algebraically) as that would help build a better intuition for things.

Student100 said:
I don't understand that.
...
Statics is just a branch of mechanics, so any mechanics book should be appropriate. There are also engineering books on the topic you might find beneficial.

I would take the comment to mean he wants you to "think like an engineer," which is more about drawing sketches and diagrams than doing pages of vector algebra.

But I don't expect he want you do use really "old-school" graphical methods, and solve some of the those problems by making accurate scale drawings (by hand, not with a CAD package)! But when it was done that way in real life, the more intuition and insight you could get just be looking at the situation, the less you needed to draw.
 
AlephZero said:
I would take the comment to mean he wants you to "think like an engineer," which is more about drawing sketches and diagrams than doing pages of vector algebra.

But I don't expect he want you do use really "old-school" graphical methods, and solve some of the those problems by making accurate scale drawings (by hand, not with a CAD package)! But when it was done that way in real life, the more intuition and insight you could get just be looking at the situation, the less you needed to draw.

Well that makes sense; In a tedious, torturous, fun sort of way.
 
AlephZero said:
I would take the comment to mean he wants you to "think like an engineer," which is more about drawing sketches and diagrams than doing pages of vector algebra.

But I don't expect he want you do use really "old-school" graphical methods, and solve some of the those problems by making accurate scale drawings (by hand, not with a CAD package)! But when it was done that way in real life, the more intuition and insight you could get just be looking at the situation, the less you needed to draw.

The first method, yes, but then he said he'd still be somewhat if we did the second method as well.

And Woopy, thanks for the suggestion. Any other options? (i.e, based on the exams)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
605
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K