MHB Sum of 2 Primes: 45 - (2 Digit Integer)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ilikebugs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Primes Sum
AI Thread Summary
To solve the problem of finding the sum of two primes that results in a two-digit odd integer, the discussion focuses on subtracting the count of such integers from 45. It is established that the sum of two primes must include the prime number 2 to yield an odd result, leading to the examination of the primality of n-2 for odd integers n. The conclusion reached is that there are 21 odd two-digit numbers where n-2 is prime, resulting in a final answer of 24. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly identifying prime numbers in this context. The analysis confirms that about half of the odd two-digit numbers cannot be expressed as a sum of two primes.
Ilikebugs
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
View attachment 6519 I think that we have to get all 2 digit odd numbers that can be expressed as the sum of 2 primes and subtract that from 45, so I think that the answer would be 45-(number of 2 digit integers n that are prime and have n-2 be prime as well)?
 

Attachments

  • potw 5.png
    potw 5.png
    41.7 KB · Views: 113
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ilikebugs said:
I think that we have to get all 2 digit odd numbers that can be expressed as the sum of 2 primes and subtract that from 45, so I think that the answer would be 45-(number of 2 digit integers n that are prime and have n-2 be prime as well)?

$n$ doesn't have to be prime.
 
The question seems interesting. The answer is $24$. That is, about half of the odd 2-didit numbers cannot be expressed as a sum of two primes. The proof is simple. The sum if two primes must contain $2$, for otherwise the number cannot be odd. Thus, we have just check the primality of $n-2$ , where $n$ is any odd number.
 
Last edited:
Arent there 21 odd 2 digit numbers where n-2 is prime, so its 24?
 
Ilikebugs said:
Arent there 21 odd 2 digit numbers where n-2 is prime, so its 24?

True, I missed one. Corrected though
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top