Sum of first n Fibonacci numbers with respect to n?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dimension10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers Sum
Click For Summary
The nth Fibonacci number is defined by the formula involving the golden ratio, but the discussion focuses on finding the sum of the first n Fibonacci numbers. The elegant formula for this sum is F_0 + F_1 + ... + F_n = F_{n+2} - 1. A correction was made to the initial formula provided, ensuring proper brackets were included. The corrected formula for the sum can also be expressed using the Fibonacci definition in terms of the golden ratio. This discussion clarifies the relationship between Fibonacci numbers and their sums effectively.
dimension10
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
I know that the nth Fibonacci number is defined as:

\frac{{1+\sqrt{5}}^{n}-{1-\sqrt{5}}^{n}}{{2}^{n}\sqrt{5}}

But may I know the formula for the sum of the first n Fibonacci numbers with respect to n? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi dimension10! :smile:

That formula you give can't possibly be correct, since it evaluates to 0... Did you forget to add some brackets?

Anyway, the most elegant formula for the sum of the first n Fibonacci numbers is

F_0+F_1+...+F_n=F_{n+2}-1

Using the (correct) formula for F_{n+2} gives you the desired formula.

Check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_number
 
Isn't it just an obvious application of

F_n = F_{n-1} + F_{n-2}

definition?
 
micromass said:
Hi dimension10! :smile:

That formula you give can't possibly be correct, since it evaluates to 0... Did you forget to add some brackets?

Yes.I meant
\frac{{(1+\sqrt{5})}^{n}-{(1-\sqrt{5})}^{n}}{{2}^{n}\sqrt{5}}

micromass said:
Anyway, the most elegant formula for the sum of the first n Fibonacci numbers is

F_0+F_1+...+F_n=F_{n+2}-1

Using the (correct) formula for F_{n+2} gives you the desired formula.

Check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_number

Thanks.
 
So we could write it as:

\frac{{(1+\sqrt{5})}^{n+2}-{(1-\sqrt{5})}^{n+2}}{{2}^{n+2}\sqrt{5}}-1
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K