Sum of IID random variables and MGF of normal distribution

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the sum of independent and identically distributed (iid) random variables and the moment-generating function (MGF) of the normal distribution. It clarifies that while the distribution of the mean of these sums approaches a normal distribution as N increases, the sum itself does not converge in distribution to a normal distribution. The importance of specifying the type of convergence when discussing this topic is emphasized. Additionally, the original poster seeks proof steps related to their inquiry about the MGF of iid variables. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate interpretations in probability theory.
Luna=Luna
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
If the distribution of a sum of N iid random variables tends to the normal distribution as n tends to infinity, shouldn't the MGF of all random variables raised to the Nth power tend to the MGF of the normal distribution?

I tried to do this with the sum of bernouli variables and exponential variables and didn'treally get anywhere with either.

Does anyone know if this is even possible and where I can find the proof steps?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Luna=Luna said:
If the distribution of a sum of N iid random variables tends to the normal distribution as n tends to infinity

You have to specify what type of convergence you're talking about when you say "tends". ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergence_of_random_variables)

The sum of iid random variables doesn't converge (in distribution) to a normal distribution. It's the mean of the sum that converges to a normal distribution.
 
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K