Sum of Series (1/n^2) Approximation & Error Estimation

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on estimating the sum of the series (1/n^2) from 1 to infinity using the first 10 terms and determining the accuracy of this estimate. Participants explore the remainder theorem and its application in error estimation, specifically using the formula R_N ≤ a_N + ∫_N^(infinity) f(x)dx. There is clarification on the use of one or two boundaries when estimating error, emphasizing that the series converges with positive terms, which implies a lower boundary of 0. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the integral test for convergence and its relevance in calculating error bounds. Overall, the thread provides insights into series approximation and error estimation techniques.
remaan
Messages
132
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Using the sum of the first 10 terms ,
Estimate the sum of the series (1/n^2) n from 1 to infinity ? How good the estimate is ?

c) Find a value for n that will ensure that the error in the approximation s= sn is less than .001.

Homework Equations



I think Rn = s - sn

The Attempt at a Solution



Am ok with that, but how to know who good the appr. is ??
And do we do the integration to find the value of n ? if so please tell how ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your book for a remainder theorem associated with the integral test. Is it there?
 
Uha, I think that you mean this formula

Sn+ ∫_(n+1 )^(infity )▒〖f(x)dx<s<Sn+ ∫_n^(infinity )▒f(x)dx〗

Do you think that this works for part c ?
 
Your equation doesn't appear as it should on my browser, but there's a simple theorem for estimating the remainder R_N that exists when the nth partial sum S_N of a convergent series is computed. It says:

R_N\leq a_N+\int_N^{\infty}f(x)dx

And yes, it will help for part c.
 
Uha, thanks alot..

But, I still wondering when do we use two boundries and when to use only one when computing the error ??
 
You're not computing the error, you're estimating it. And any series that converges by the integral test has only positive terms. So there is always an implicit lower boundary of 0 on R_N.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K