Summation question within complex numbers

  • Thread starter jj364
  • Start date
  • #1
18
0

Homework Statement



Find the sum of the series

[itex]\displaystyle S_1=1 + \frac{x^3}{3!}+\frac{x^6}{6!}+\,\dots[/itex]

Can't seem to get the bit above to show up nicely, should be 1+x^3/3! +x^6/6! +... Sorry!!

Homework Equations



In a prior part of the question I had to find the complex roots of z3-1=0 which I did and got:

1, e[itex]\frac{2\pi}{3}[/itex], e[itex]\frac{4\pi}{3}[/itex]

and then by writing z3-1=0 as being equal to the product of its roots I was able to show that [itex]\omega[/itex]2+[itex]\omega[/itex]+1=0 where [itex]\omega[/itex] is a complex root


The Attempt at a Solution



Using all of this I then have to solve the summation so I'm sure that the prior questions have something to do with solving the summations I'm just not really sure how to relate them. I've only really been able to look at maclaurin series' for various functions but have had no joy as to further inspiration.

Any help would be greatly appreciated, thank you in advance!
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
SammyS
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
11,315
1,006

Homework Statement



Find the sum of the series

S1=1 + [itex]\frac{x3}{3!}[/itex] + [itex]\frac{x6}{6!}[/itex] +...

Can't seem to get the bit above to show up nicely, should be 1+x^3/3! +x^6/6! +... Sorry!!

Homework Equations



In a prior part of the question I had to find the complex roots of z3-1=0 which I did and got:

1, e[itex]\frac{2\pi}{3}[/itex], e[itex]\frac{4\pi}{3}[/itex]

and then by writing z3-1=0 as being equal to the product of its roots I was able to show that [itex]\omega[/itex]2+[itex]\omega[/itex]+1=0 where [itex]\omega[/itex] is a complex root


The Attempt at a Solution



Using all of this I then have to solve the summation so I'm sure that the prior questions have something to do with solving the summations I'm just not really sure how to relate them. I've only really been able to look at maclaurin series' for various functions but have had no joy as to further inspiration.

Any help would be greatly appreciated, thank you in advance!
You can't put LaTeX in a [ SUP] superscript.

Do the whole expression in LaTeX.

[ itex]\displaystyle S_1=1 + \frac{x^3}{3!}+\frac{x^6}{6!}+\,\dots[/itex]

gives

[itex]\displaystyle S_1=1 + \frac{x^3}{3!}+\frac{x^6}{6!}+\,\dots[/itex]
 
  • #3
18
0
Ah thanks! Makes it a lot easier to read. Not so good at LaTeX!
 
  • #4
296
0
The above looks awfully like the exponential series in the sense that it only has multiples of 3 as its summation values as a difference. In fact, if you look at the sum you want to find and express it as a function of x, you'll see that it satisfies the differential equation [itex]f^{(3)}(x)=f(x)[/itex] with initial conditions f(0)=1, f'(0)=0 and f''(0)=0. Can you solve this?

(Note: You actually have to solve the equation [itex]x^3-1=0[/itex] during the solution to this differential equation, so it reveals the purpose of the previous exercise.)
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Ray Vickson
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Dearly Missed
10,706
1,728

Homework Statement



Find the sum of the series

[itex]\displaystyle S_1=1 + \frac{x^3}{3!}+\frac{x^6}{6!}+\,\dots[/itex]

Can't seem to get the bit above to show up nicely, should be 1+x^3/3! +x^6/6! +... Sorry!!

Homework Equations



In a prior part of the question I had to find the complex roots of z3-1=0 which I did and got:

1, e[itex]\frac{2\pi}{3}[/itex], e[itex]\frac{4\pi}{3}[/itex]

and then by writing z3-1=0 as being equal to the product of its roots I was able to show that [itex]\omega[/itex]2+[itex]\omega[/itex]+1=0 where [itex]\omega[/itex] is a complex root


The Attempt at a Solution



Using all of this I then have to solve the summation so I'm sure that the prior questions have something to do with solving the summations I'm just not really sure how to relate them. I've only really been able to look at maclaurin series' for various functions but have had no joy as to further inspiration.

Any help would be greatly appreciated, thank you in advance!
The sum above is not easy. You can find it by entering sum(x^(3*k)/(3*k)!,k=0..infinity) into a computer algebra system such as Maple or Wolfram Alpha. Give it a try.
 
  • #6
296
0
The above looks awfully like the exponential series in the sense that it only has multiples of 3 as its summation values as a difference. In fact, if you look at the sum you want to find and express it as a function of x, you'll see that it satisfies the differential equation [itex]f^{(3)}(x)=f(x)[/itex] with initial conditions f(0)=1, f'(0)=0 and f''(0)=0. Can you solve this?

(Note: You actually have to solve the equation [itex]x^3-1=0[/itex] during the solution to this differential equation, so it reveals the purpose of the previous exercise.)
I just solved the question using this method and compared it with Mathematica's and WolframAlpha's answers, and it checks out. Another tip if you need it: Take the Laplace transform of both sides.
 
  • #7
18
0
I'm still a little confused I think. I managed to get the the differential equation whose auxiliary equation is m^3-1=0 which is what I solved in the previous section but for complex numbers not real, or does it not matter?

Because if I use my solutions for z^3-1=0 then I end up with very funny answers. Or do I have to take real components? Just quite confused as to where I actually go from here to get an answer?
 
  • #8
296
0
I'm still a little confused I think. I managed to get the the differential equation whose auxiliary equation is m^3-1=0 which is what I solved in the previous section but for complex numbers not real, or does it not matter?

Because if I use my solutions for z^3-1=0 then I end up with very funny answers. Or do I have to take real components? Just quite confused as to where I actually go from here to get an answer?
Well, the method I suggested was using the Laplace transform. I wouldn't know about other methods, but your one seems like it'd work to me. The funny answers you end up with, try finding trigonometric patterns inside them.
 
  • #9
18
0
Ok I think I've worked it out now, I wrote out the differential equation and the auxiliary equation gave me answers of

m=Aex + Bex([itex]\frac{-1}{2}[/itex]+[itex]\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}[/itex]) + Cex([itex]\frac{-1}{2}[/itex]+[itex]\frac{-\sqrt{3}}{2}[/itex])

Which I can solve using initial conditions to get A=B=C=1/3 so the final sum is

S(x)=[itex]\frac{1}{3}[/itex]ex+[itex]\frac{2}{3}[/itex]e[itex]\frac{-x}{2}[/itex]cos([itex]\frac{\sqrt{3}x}{2}[/itex])

Is this right?
 
  • #10
SammyS
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
11,315
1,006
Ok I think I've worked it out now, I wrote out the differential equation and the auxiliary equation gave me answers of

m=Aex + Bex([itex]\frac{-1}{2}[/itex]+[itex]\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}[/itex]) + Cex([itex]\frac{-1}{2}[/itex]+[itex]\frac{-\sqrt{3}}{2}[/itex])

Which I can solve using initial conditions to get A=B=C=1/3 so the final sum is

S(x)=[itex]\frac{1}{3}[/itex]ex+[itex]\frac{2}{3}[/itex]e[itex]\frac{-x}{2}[/itex]cos([itex]\frac{\sqrt{3}x}{2}[/itex])

Is this right?
(I feel like I'm playing the role of Mr. LaTeX here!) LOL!

Fracional exponents ---difficult to read:
Using \frac{}{} for fractions in superscripts in LaTeX inline mode is bad enough. Putting a LaTeX \frac{}{} in a SUPerscript tag [] make reading even harder.

I like to use the \displaystyle modifier & do the whole expression in LaTeX:
[itex]\displaystyle \large m=Ae^x+Be^{x\left(\frac{-1}{2}+\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\right)}+Ce^{x\left(\frac{-1}{2}+\frac{-\sqrt{3}}{2}\right)}[/itex]​
(I also bumped up the size one notch to make the exponents somewhat readable.)

For fractional exponents with simple denominators, using / rather than ]frac{}{} works well in normal size.
[itex]\displaystyle S(x)=\frac{1}{3}e^x+\frac{2}{3}e^{-x/2}\cos\left( \frac{\sqrt{3\,}\,x}{2}\right)[/itex]​
 
  • #11
329
0
Hint:

Notice that [tex]e^z + e^{-z} = 2 \left(1 + \frac{1}{3!} z^2 + \frac{1}{4!} z^4 + \dots \right)[/tex]
because the odd-numbered terms in the power series cancel.

This is a standard trick with power series; to isolate the even powers of z in the series for f(z), just consider f(z) + f(-z).

Now, what would happen if we looked at the series [tex]e^z + e^{\omega z} + e^{\omega^2 z}[/tex] where [itex]\omega= \exp(2 \pi i / 3)[/itex]?
Some of the terms in the power series will cancel. Which terms will cancel, and which terms will remain?
 
  • #12
296
0
Ok I think I've worked it out now, I wrote out the differential equation and the auxiliary equation gave me answers of

m=Aex + Bex([itex]\frac{-1}{2}[/itex]+[itex]\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}[/itex]) + Cex([itex]\frac{-1}{2}[/itex]+[itex]\frac{-\sqrt{3}}{2}[/itex])

Which I can solve using initial conditions to get A=B=C=1/3 so the final sum is

S(x)=[itex]\frac{1}{3}[/itex]ex+[itex]\frac{2}{3}[/itex]e[itex]\frac{-x}{2}[/itex]cos([itex]\frac{\sqrt{3}x}{2}[/itex])

Is this right?
Indeed it is.
 

Related Threads on Summation question within complex numbers

Replies
5
Views
118
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
625
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
3K
Top