Super fun projectile motion ski slope problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a projectile motion problem involving a ski-jumper who launches horizontally at 20 m/s from a height of 3 meters above a slope angled at 45 degrees. The participant utilized the equations of motion, specifically y = Vsinθ - (0.5)gt² and x = Vcosθt, to derive the trajectory and landing distance. The participant expressed concern about discrepancies between calculated results and measured outcomes, particularly regarding the correct incorporation of the initial height. The analysis confirms that the starting height was appropriately factored into the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of projectile motion principles
  • Familiarity with kinematic equations
  • Basic trigonometry, particularly with angles and slopes
  • Ability to apply the quadratic formula
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of projectile motion equations in detail
  • Explore the impact of initial height on projectile trajectories
  • Learn how to calculate distances along inclined planes
  • Investigate error analysis techniques in physics experiments
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of projectile motion, particularly in real-world applications such as sports physics and engineering.

Peppo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A ski-jumper comes off the bottom of the slope going horizontally at a speed of 20 ms. It starts off 3 m above a slope going downwards at an angle of 45 degrees. How far along the slope does it land.

Homework Equations



1) y= Vsinθ - (.5)gt^2
2) x= Vcosθt
3) tanβ = ||y|| / ||x||

The Attempt at a Solution



I attempted to find the solution by considering the beginning of the slope to be at the origin with the skiier starting 3 metres above it so my equation for y position was:

4) y = Vsinθt - (.5)gt^2 + 3

-which simplifies to: y = -.5gt^2 + 3 since sinθ is zero.

The x position is given by equation 2.
Using equation 3 to change equation 2 to give the y-position corresponding to the x-position led me to:

-y/V = t (since Vcosθ = V in this case)

I then used this in equation 4 to replace t, and used the quadratic formula to get an answer for the y value.

After this step the distance is just a matter of finding the hypotenuse of a triangle and isn't of interest to me, but what I'm concerned about is that the answer I got is off slightly from what I found when I measured out the problem on computation paper and it's outside (just by a little too much) the error margins given the tools I used for drawing it.

My question is whether or not I correctly incorporated the starting position of 3 metres above the 45 degree angle slope? Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks right. If you'd shown your working and answers I would have seen whether your answers accord with mine.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K