Supersonic Flight: Lift & Pressure Differences

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter flirt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lift Supersonic
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanisms of lift in supersonic versus subsonic flight, exploring the roles of angle of attack, pressure differences, and the effects of shock waves. Participants examine how these factors contribute to lift generation in different flight regimes, with a focus on the complexities introduced at supersonic speeds.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that lift in supersonic flight is primarily due to angle of attack and flow deflection, while in subsonic flight, it is more about pressure differences.
  • Another participant argues that lift is always dependent on angle of attack and emphasizes Newton's third law as essential for lift creation, questioning the relevance of Bernoulli's principle in this context.
  • A different viewpoint indicates that while subsonic lift mechanisms still apply in supersonic flight, they become less significant, with a focus on managing shock waves and heat in supersonic conditions.
  • One participant elaborates on the complexities of lift generation in supersonic flow, noting that shocks disrupt Bernoulli's assumptions and that lift is still generated by pressure differences influenced by shock behavior.
  • A participant acknowledges a misuse of terminology regarding "buoyancy" in the context of lift, indicating a need for clarity in definitions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms of lift in supersonic versus subsonic flight, with no consensus reached on the primary factors influencing lift generation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the relative importance of various principles and effects.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of lift generation in supersonic flight, including the influence of shock waves and the breakdown of Bernoulli's assumptions. There is an acknowledgment of the need for further clarification on terms and principles used in the discussion.

flirt
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Supersonic Lift?

Lift appears to be from the angle of attack, due to the deflection of flow-stream in supersonic flight but then in subsonic flight the pressure difference causes lift. So what is going on here that i am missing? Why such a change? Its starting to confuse me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Lift is always dependent on the angle of attack, I don't think it has anything to do with supersonic vs subsonic. Newton's third law is what is essential for creating this lift. The buoyancy effect due to the pressure difference (Bernoulli's principle) only works with airfoils oriented the correct way (and would not work, for example, on airplanes flying upside down). I don't really know how much of the lift if due to which effect though, for that, ask an aerospace engineer.
 


Okay this is way to long and involved to go into it requires a full degree :-)

Basically the lift process of a normal sub sonic wing will still work it just isn't the most important thing when you go supersonic.

The lift-to-drag ratio drops massively once you go beyond mach 1 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lift-to-drag_ratio) so lift is rather trivial unlike sub sonic flight.

The biggest problem with supersonic cars is keeping them on the ground.

Controlling shock waves forming and heat at all the contact surfaces become much more important than the actual lift and that's what brings about the change of wing shape etc.
You can also use the shock waves to provide extra lift etc via airfoil design

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersonic_airfoils should give you enough background.

Once you get up around mach 5 it gets even more fuzzy you enter the realm of hypersonic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypersonic

if you look at the table in that it will give you a basic view of the wing changes and why.
 


Matterwave said:
Lift is always dependent on the angle of attack, I don't think it has anything to do with supersonic vs subsonic. Newton's third law is what is essential for creating this lift. The buoyancy effect due to the pressure difference (Bernoulli's principle) only works with airfoils oriented the correct way (and would not work, for example, on airplanes flying upside down). I don't really know how much of the lift if due to which effect though, for that, ask an aerospace engineer.

Bernoulli has nothing to do with buoyancy. It simply describes the pressure along a streamline as a function of the local velocity, assuming an inviscid, incompressible flow. For subsonic airfoils, it isn't really a case of Bernoulli vs Newton - they're actually equivalent ways of looking at the problem, and either will give you the correct answer for low speed airfoils (Oh, and a momentum balance [Newton] always works, regardless of speed and geometry).

In supersonic flow, shocks exist, and that completely messes up the assumptions for Bernoulli. They feature high viscous dissipation, so the flow as a whole is no longer inviscid, and it certainly isn't incompressible. At supersonic speeds, lift is still generated by the pressure difference between the lower and upper surfaces (this is pretty much always true). However, that pressure difference is caused by the different shocks generated at the leading edge - the shock going down from the leading edge is stronger than the shock going upwards (which doesn't even always exist - sometimes you'll have an expansion fan going upwards, but I digress...). Because of this, the pressure jump across the shock going down from the leading edge is larger than the one across the shock going up. This causes a higher pressure beneath the wing, which causes lift.
 


I shouldn't have used the word "buoyancy", that's my bad.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
15K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K