Suppose that f : R -> R is continuous and one-to-one

  • Thread starter Thread starter ek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in advanced calculus concerning the properties of continuous and one-to-one functions defined from the real numbers to themselves. The original poster seeks assistance in proving a specific property related to the image of an interval under such a function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the possibility of using proof by contradiction and reference a theorem regarding continuous functions mapping intervals to intervals. There is a suggestion to consider the implications of the function being one-to-one in conjunction with the properties of continuous functions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance by referencing relevant theorems and suggesting potential approaches. The original poster has acknowledged their familiarity with the connected set theorem, indicating a productive direction in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses a lack of confidence in their mathematical skills and is preparing for challenges in their advanced calculus course, which may influence their approach to the problem.

ek
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
Sorry for no description of the type of question, but I'm so out to lunch on this stuff I don't even know what I'd call it. Ok, so I'm not looking for answers here, I'd just appreciate being pushed in the right direction.

Suppose that f : R -> R is continuous and one-to-one (that is, x1 != x2 --> f(x1) != f(x2). Prove that for each interval I = [a,b] contained in R either f(I) = [f(a), f(b)] or f(I) = [f(b), f(a)].

I have no idea what to consider for this problem.

Sorry for the bad notation. I'm not too proficient at latex.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps a proof by contradiction would work?
 
It is hard to suggest how to prove something like that without knowing what you have to work with. For example, there is a theorem saying that a continuous function maps an interval into an interval. Do you know that theorem and can you use it? It's a special case of a more general theorem that says that a continuous function maps a connected set into a connected set- and, of course, in R connected sets are precisely intervals.

If you can use that theorem then you have immediately that f([a, b])= [c, d] for some c, d. Then use "one-to-one" to prove c= f(a), d= f(b) or c= f(b), d= f(a).
 
Thanks very much for the help and sorry for the late reply.

This is a third year "advanced calculus" class and I was privy to the connected set theorem.

I suck (relatively anyway, compared to phys/astr) at math, getting through this final major math class will be quite a challenge to get my degree (Astronomy).

I'll probably be calling upon the very knowlegable PF members for some guidance throughout the semester.

Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K