What is the total distance traveled by a bullet fragment after an explosion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Riman643
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bullet Momentum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving projectile motion and the effects of an explosion on a shell shot at an angle. The original poster attempts to calculate the total distance traveled by a bullet fragment after an explosion, considering initial velocities and the trajectory of the fragments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of initial velocities in both x and y directions, the time to reach the apex, and the implications of the explosion on horizontal velocity. Questions arise regarding the conservation of momentum and the interpretation of the results.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning assumptions about momentum and velocity changes. Some guidance has been offered regarding the importance of working symbolically and the relationship between the explosion and the resulting velocities of the fragments. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the assumptions made about the mass of the fragments and the effects of the explosion on their velocities. The discussion also highlights the need for clarity in units when applying momentum equations.

Riman643
Messages
62
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
A shell is shot with an initial velocity Vo of 22 m/s, at an angle of θ = 59° with the horizontal. At the top of the trajectory, the shell explodes into two fragments of equal mass (see the figure). One fragment, whose speed immediately after the explosion is zero, falls vertically. How far from the gun does the other fragment land, assuming that the terrain is level and that air drag is negligible?
Relevant Equations
Basic kinematics
p = mv
Okay so the first thing I did was was find the height of the apex. I found this by finding the x and y components of Vo:
Vox = VoCos(θ) = 22cos(59) = 11.33 m/s
Voy = VoSin(θ) = 22sin(59) = 18.86 m/s

Using the initial velocity of the y component I found the time it took to reach the apex:
t = -Voy / ay = -18.86/-9.8 = 1.93 s

Using the time I found the height of the apex:
Δy = Voyt + (1/2)ayt^2 = 18.86(1.93) + (1/2)(-9.8)(1.93^2) = 18.15 m

Using the height I found the time it took after the explosion for the bullet fragment to reach the ground. Because the bullet was at the apex, the initial velocity of the fragments is zero in the y direction
t = √(Δy/(1/2ay)) = √[(-18.15)/((1/2)(-9.8))] = 1.94s

Using the momentum equation I was able to find the initial velocity of the bullet fragment in the x direction:
Pi = Pf; 22m = (1/2)mVo; Vo = 44

Finally using the two times and two speeds of the fragment in the x direction I found (wrong according to the website) the total distance:
Δx = (Vox * t) + (Vox * t) = (11.33)(1.93) + (44)(1.94) = 107.23 m
 

Attachments

  • fig09_46new.gif
    fig09_46new.gif
    1.5 KB · Views: 323
Physics news on Phys.org
Riman643 said:
Problem Statement: A shell is shot with an initial velocity Vo of 22 m/s, at an angle of θ = 59° with the horizontal. At the top of the trajectory, the shell explodes into two fragments of equal mass (see the figure). One fragment, whose speed immediately after the explosion is zero, falls vertically. How far from the gun does the other fragment land, assuming that the terrain is level and that air drag is negligible?
Relevant Equations: Basic kinematics
p = mv

Using the momentum equation I was able to find the initial velocity of the bullet fragment in the x direction:
Pi = Pf; 22m = (1/2)mVo; Vo = 44
What is the initial velocity in the x-direction?
 
Before the collision the initial velocity is 11.33 m/s. Then treating the explosion as a separate event, I made the initial velocity in the x direction of the gun fragment 44 m/s.
 
Riman643 said:
Before the collision the initial velocity is 11.33 m/s. Then treating the explosion as a separate event, I made the initial velocity in the x direction of the gun fragment 44 m/s.
How did the horizontal velocity increase during the ascent to 22m/s?
 
haruspex said:
How did the horizontal velocity increase during the ascent to 22m/s?
It did not increase during the ascent. It increased when the bullet reached the apex because of the explosion.
 
Riman643 said:
It did not increase during the ascent. It increased when the bullet reached the apex because of the explosion.
How do you figure that it went from 11.33 m/s to 44 m/s? Were not the two fragments of the same mass?
 
gneill said:
How do you figure that it went from 11.33 m/s to 44 m/s? Were not the two fragments of the same mass?
I just realized I used Vo not Vox for the momentum in the x direction. I will try with that next. But I want to make sure my thinking on this is correct. The initial momentum must equal the final momentum (pi = pf) where
pi = 11.33m and pf = (1/2)mv. Setting them equal to each other it should be:

11.33m = (1/2)mV
V = 22.66
 
Riman643 said:
I just realized I used Vo not Vox for the momentum in the x direction. I will try with that next. But I want to make sure my thinking on this is correct. The initial momentum must equal the final momentum (pi = pf) where
pi = 11.33m and pf = (1/2)mv. Setting them equal to each other it should be:

11.33m = (1/2)mV
V = 22.66
Yes. Check your units for pi (see highlighted text in the quote). Momentum does not have units of only length.
 
Riman643 said:
I just realized I used Vo not Vox for the momentum in the x direction. I will try with that next. But I want to make sure my thinking on this is correct. The initial momentum must equal the final momentum (pi = pf) where
pi = 11.33m and pf = (1/2)mv. Setting them equal to each other it should be:

11.33m = (1/2)mV
V = 22.66
Yes.
But I strongly recommend you get into the habit of working entirely symbolically, only plugging in numbers at the end. It has many benefits.

You did not need to calculate the descent time. In the absence of drag, it must be the same as the ascent.

The problem in this thread can be solved very quickly if you know the range formula: http://www.softschools.com/formulas/physics/horizontal_range_formula/154/.
Since the explosion doubles the horizontal speed of the ongoing half, it doubles that half of the range, leading to 3/2 times the range calculated from the formula.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE
  • #10
gneill said:
Yes. Check your units for pi (see highlighted text in the quote). Momentum does not have units of only length.
The 11.33 is m/s. The m represents the mass in the momentum equation. Sorry for the confusion.
 
  • #11
haruspex said:
Yes.
But I strongly recommend you get into the habit of working entirely symbolically, only plugging in numbers at the end. It has many benefits.

You did not need to calculate the descent time. In the absence of drag, it must be the same as the ascent.

The problem in this thread can be solved very quickly if you know the range formula: http://www.softschools.com/formulas/physics/horizontal_range_formula/154/.
Since the explosion doubles the horizontal speed of the ongoing half, it doubles that half of the range, leading to 3/2 times the range calculated from the formula.
Yeah, I've been given that advice before. I'm new to physics so I'm just trying to solve the problems the way I know how at the moment.
 
  • #12
Riman643 said:
The 11.33 is m/s. The m represents the mass in the momentum equation. Sorry for the confusion.
Okay. I was confused because mixing numbers without units with variables that have implied units is somewhat confusing. I highly recommend @haruspex 's suggestion regarding doing the work symbolically until the very end.
 
  • #13
haruspex said:
The problem in this thread can be solved very quickly if you know the range formula: http://www.softschools.com/formulas/physics/horizontal_range_formula/154/.
Since the explosion doubles the horizontal speed of the ongoing half, it doubles that half of the range, leading to 3/2 times the range calculated from the formula.
A small addendum to that: This works only (as is the case here) if the CM follows the projectile's original trajectory. The fragments must land simultaneously, which is the case if their vertical velocity is zero immediately after the explosion.
gneill said:
I highly recommend @haruspex 's suggestion regarding doing the work symbolically until the very end.
Amen to that.
 
  • #14
haruspex said:
But I strongly recommend you get into the habit of working entirely symbolically, only plugging in numbers at the end. It has many benefits.
Me too.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K