Supremum and Infimum of Set S: Homework Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fairy111
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining whether the set S, defined as S= {1+(-1)^n times (1/n), n is part of the natural numbers \ {0}}, has a supremum or an infimum. Participants are analyzing the elements of the set based on the provided formula.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to generate the set by substituting values for n, leading to various interpretations of the elements. Questions arise regarding the correct identification of the infimum and supremum, with some participants expressing uncertainty about the definitions and properties of these concepts.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants providing clarifications and corrections regarding the calculations and definitions of infimum and supremum. There is a mix of interpretations being explored, and while some guidance has been offered, no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the formula and its implications, particularly concerning the values generated for different n. Some participants question the initial setup and the definitions being applied to the problem.

Fairy111
Messages
72
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the following case decide, whether the set S has a supremum or an infimum.

Homework Equations



S= {1+(-1)^n times (1/n), n is part of the natural numbers \ {0}}

The Attempt at a Solution



I first started to form the set S but substituting in numbers for n,

so i came up with the set, { 1, 0, 3/2, 2/3 ...}

So i thought that the infimum would be 1, as that is the largest lower bound. I am not sure what the supremum is though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fairy111 said:
so i came up with the set, { 1, 0, 3/2, 2/3 ...}

So i thought that the infimum would be 1, as that is the largest lower bound.

But 2/3 < 1.
 
sorry, yes 2/3 is the infimum. How do i find the supremum though?
 
The definition of your set seems a bit weird. Are you saying that n is a natural number (typically denoting a positive integer) not including 0? The formula wouldn't be defined for n = 0, so I will assume that we start at n = 1. For n = 1, you get 1 + (-1) = 0; for n = 3, you get 2/3; for n = 5, you get 4/5; for n = 7, you get 6/7. In general, for n = 2k + 1, where k is a nonnegative integer, you will get 1 + (-1)^(2k+1) * [1/(2k+1)] = 1 - [1/(2k+1)]. It should be clear what happens as k gets larger. This handles odd n (remember that 0 is in the set).

After analyzing the even terms on your own, it should be clear what the sup and inf are.
 
Fairy111 said:

Homework Statement



In the following case decide, whether the set S has a supremum or an infimum.

Homework Equations



S= {1+(-1)^n times (1/n), n is part of the natural numbers \ {0}}

The Attempt at a Solution



I first started to form the set S but substituting in numbers for n,

so i came up with the set, { 1, 0, 3/2, 2/3 ...}
No, that's incorrect. You may be trying to rush this because you are not even using the formula correctly. The first number, n= 1, is (1- (-1)1)/1= 0. Then n= 2 gives (1- (-1))2)/2= 2/2= 1, not 3/2. n= 3 gives (1-(1)3)/3= 0/3= 0. n= 4 gives (1- (-1)4)/4= 2/4= 1/2. It should be obvious that for n any odd number, (-1)n= -1 so (1+ (-1)n)/n= 0/n= 0. For any even n, (-1)n= 1 so (1+ (-1)n)/n= 2/n.

So i thought that the infimum would be 1, as that is the largest lower bound. I am not sure what the supremum is though.

Fairy111 said:
sorry, yes 2/3 is the infimum. How do i find the supremum though?

You need to review the definitions! The infimum of a set is the "largest of all lower bounds", that is correct. But a "lower bound" is a number less than or equal to any number in the set. "1" is not a lower bound at all because 0< 1 so 1 is not "less than or equal to any number in the set".
Similarly, 2/3 is NOT the infimum because, again, it is not a lower bound at all: 0< 2/3.

Every number in this set is either 0 or 2/n. It should be easy to see what the infimum is from that! and, since 2/n< 1 for all n> 2 it should also be easy to see what the supremum is. Notice that, for this set, both infimum and supremum are in the set. That does not always happen.

I notice that you are not actually required to find the supremum and infimum, only decide whether or not they exist. But finding something is the best way to show it exists!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
eh, I think problem is slightly more interesting if the formula was 1 + [(-1)^n / n] but hallsofivy might have the more plausible formula.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
915
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K