Surface Area and Surface Integrals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the surface area of the paraboloid defined by the equation x² + y + z² = 2, specifically the portion above the plane y = 0. The correct approach involves using the parameterization of the surface and calculating the normal vector, which is derived from the cross product of the partial derivatives. The gradient vector's magnitude is √(4x² + 4z² + 1), leading to the differential area element dA = √(4x² + 4z² + 1) dxdz. The confusion arose from a misleading solution manual that suggested using polar coordinates without proper justification for substituting values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of surface integrals in multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with parameterization of surfaces
  • Knowledge of vector calculus, specifically cross products
  • Ability to compute gradients and normal vectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of parameterizing surfaces in three dimensions
  • Learn how to compute surface integrals using the formula for differential area elements
  • Explore the application of polar coordinates in surface integrals
  • Review examples of calculating surface areas for various geometric shapes
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those focusing on multivariable calculus and surface integrals, as well as professionals involved in mathematical modeling and engineering applications requiring surface area calculations.

mit_hacker
Messages
86
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(Q) Find the area of the surface cut from the paraboloid x^2+y+z^2 = 2 by the plane y=0.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The unit normal vector in this case will be j. Moreover, the gradient vector will be
sqrt(4x^2+4z^2+1). And the denominator which is the dot product of the gradient vector and j is 1 so we need not bother about that.

So the double integral will be that of sqrt (4x^2+4z^2+1) but since y=0, it means that x^2+z^2 = 2 so sqrt (4x^2+4z^2+1) becomes 3.

The problem is that the solution manual does not do this. It retain the integral as sqrt (4x^2+4z^2+1) and uses polar co-ordinates which I can do but I don't understand why we cannot substitute. Please explain.

Thank-you very much for the time and effort!:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mit_hacker said:

Homework Statement



(Q) Find the area of the surface cut from the paraboloid x^2+y+z^2 = 2 by the plane y=0.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The unit normal vector in this case will be j. Moreover, the gradient vector will be
sqrt(4x^2+4z^2+1). And the denominator which is the dot product of the gradient vector and j is 1 so we need not bother about that
So the double integral will be that of sqrt (4x^2+4z^2+1) but since y=0, it means that x^2+z^2 = 2 so sqrt (4x^2+4z^2+1) becomes 3.

The problem is that the solution manual does not do this. It retain the integral as sqrt (4x^2+4z^2+1) and uses polar co-ordinates which I can do but I don't understand why we cannot substitute. Please explain.

Thank-you very much for the time and effort!:smile:
Your first statement is wrong! In fact, after reading that "the unit normal vector in this case will be j", my first reaction was "unit normal vector to what?", certainly not the paraboloid! Then I thought, "No, it's to the y= 0 plane", and assumed you meant the solid bounded by the paraboloid and the area cut off that by the plane. But that's trivially a disk with area 2[itex]\pi[/itex] so that's not what's meant.
Now, rereading the problem, we're back to my original reaction: the "surface" involved is the part of the paraboloid x2+ y+ z2= 2 above the plane y= 0. The "normal" needed is the normal to that surface. A standard way to do that is this: think of z2+ y+ z2= 2 as y= 2- x2- z2, in terms of the two parameters x and z. In vector form that is [itex]\vec{r}= x\vec{i}+ (2- x^2- z^2)\vec{j}+ z\vec{k}[/itex]. Then [itex]\vec{r}_x= \vec{i}- 2x\vec{j}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{r}_z= -2z\vec{j}+ \vec{k}[/itex] and the "fundamental vector product" is the cross product of those vectors: [itex]-2x\vec{i}-\vec{j}-2z\vec{k}[/itex]. That vector is normal to the paraboloid at each point and its length, [itex]\sqrt{4x^2+ 4z^2+ 1}[/itex],times dxdz, is the differential of surface area, as your book says.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks a ton!

Thanks a lot for your help. I understand everything clearly now. The problem was that my book shows an extremely vague and misleading solution to approach such problems which was throwing me all around.

Thanks a ton once again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K