Surface Integral of Flux on Plane with Normal Vector and Cylinder

  • Thread starter Thread starter kasse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating the surface integral of the flux of a vector field across a plane defined by the equation z = 3x + 2, constrained within a cylinder described by x² + y² = 4. The vector field is given as F = <0, 2y, 3z>.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the normal vector and its normalization, with one participant noting a discrepancy in the definition of the unit normal vector. There are attempts to express the surface integral using different vector representations and coordinate systems, including polar coordinates.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different methods to approach the integral and questioning the assumptions made about the normal vector and area differential. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of polar coordinates and the representation of the position vector.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the normalization of the normal vector and the calculation of the area element, with participants reflecting on the implications of these factors on the integral's evaluation.

kasse
Messages
383
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Evaluate the surface integral of F*n (the flux) where n is the upward-pointing unit normal vector to the plane z = 3x+2 that lies within the cylinder x^2 + y^2 = 4. F = <0, 2y, 3z>

2. The attempt at a solution

The normal vector is <3,0,1> so that F*n = 3z. dS equals sqrt(10). I transform to polar coordinates and integrate 3*sqrt(10)*(3r^2*cos(theta) + 2r) over the cylinder. The answer I get is 24sqrt(10)*pi, while the correct answer is 24*pi. Does this mean that dS=1? Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You said n is a unit vector. Then you said n=<3,0,1>. That's not a unit vector. <3,0,1>/sqrt(10) is.
 
Time for me to rush to battle again! I fight constantly against the very notation "[itex]\vec{f}\cdot\vec{n}d\sigma[/itex]" because if you follow that literally, computing [itex]\vec{n}[/itex] and [itex]d\sigma[/itex] separately you wind up calculating the length of a vector twice and then watch them cancel out! (Unless you forget one of them!)

In this problem, we can write the position vector of a point on the plane as [itex]\vec{r}(x,y)= x\vec{i}+ y\vec{j}+ (3x+ 2)\vec{k}[/itex].
Differentiating: [itex]\vec{r}_x= \vec{i}+ 3\vec{k}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{r}_y= \vec{j}[/itex]. The cross product of those two vectors, [itex]-3\vec{i}+ \vec{k}[/itex], is the "fundamental vector product" for the plane and the vector differential of area, [itex]d\vec{\sigma}[/itex] is [itex](-3\vec{i}+ \vec{k})dxdy[/itex].

Now [itex]\int\int \vec{F}\cdot\vec{d\sigma}[/itex] [itex]= \int\int (2y\vec{j}+ 3z\vec{k})\cdot(-3\vec{i}+ \vec{k})dxdy[/itex] [itex]= \int\int 3z dxdy= 3\int\int (3x+ 2)dxdy[/itex].

Integrate that over the circle of radius 2.

Obviously the way to do that is to switch to polar coordinates. We could do that right at the beginning:
write [itex]\vec{r}(r,\theta)= rcos(\theta)\vec{i}+ rsin(\theta)\vec{j}+ (3rcos(\theta)+ 2)\vec{k}[/itex], differentiate with respect to r and [itex]\theta[/itex] and the "r" you need for rdrd[itex]\theta[/itex] pops out automatically!

[Here endeth the sermon]
 
Amen. It is clearer to keep the volume and the direction information in the same package.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K