Surface integral problem formula question

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 1K views
flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



My book says proves this formula

[tex]\iint_S f(x,y,z) dS = \iint_D f(x,y,g(x,y)) \sqrt{\left (\frac{\partial z}{\partial x} \right )^2 + \left (\frac{\partial z}{\partial y} \right )^2 + 1 } \;dA[/tex]

Any surface with equation z = g(x,y) can be regarded as a parametric surface with parametric equations

x = x

y = y

z = g(x,y)

rx = i + gx k


ry = j + gy k


|rx x ry| = [tex]\sqrt{\left (\frac{\partial z}{\partial x} \right )^2 + \left (\frac{\partial z}{\partial y} \right )^2 + 1 }[/tex]

Thus


[tex]\iint_S f(x,y,z) dS = \iint_D f(x,y,g(x,y)) \sqrt{\left (\frac{\partial z}{\partial x} \right )^2 + \left (\frac{\partial z}{\partial y} \right )^2 + 1 } \;dA[/tex]


Question

How do they know that every parametrization falls nicely as x = x and y = y?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, the surface is w = f(x, y, z), but if we're given that z is a function of x and y (i.e., z = g(x, y)), then we have w = f(x, y, g(x, y)). And instead of integrating over some surface S in three-dimensional space, we can integrate over a two-dimensional region in the x-y plane, D. I think that's all they're saying.