Surface tension of water against a gas not being air

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the surface tension of water when interacting with gases other than air, specifically hydrogen. It highlights the challenges in measuring interfacial energy due to water's vapor pressure and potential contamination from evaporation. Key references include Girifalco and Good's papers from the 1960s and 1970s, and Adamson's "Physical Chemistry of Surfaces" as a valuable resource for understanding these concepts. The consensus suggests that replacing air with hydrogen may not significantly alter the surface tension, but further research is necessary to confirm this hypothesis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of surface tension and interfacial energy
  • Familiarity with vapor pressure concepts
  • Knowledge of contamination effects in experimental measurements
  • Basic principles of physical chemistry
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Girifalco and Good's papers on interfacial energy calculations
  • Study Adamson's "Physical Chemistry of Surfaces" for foundational knowledge
  • Explore experimental methods for measuring surface tension with various gases
  • Investigate the solubility of hydrogen in water and its effects on surface tension
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in physical chemistry, materials scientists, and anyone studying the effects of gas interactions on liquid surface properties.

anders_r_r
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Surface tension is a property of two different substances. The surface tension of water against air under different conditions is given in many textbooks and data handbooks. However, if the air is replaced by, say, hydrogen, what will be the surface tension? Where will I have to look for the answer?

Thanks,
Anders
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Interfacial energy measurements can be tough to find in the literature. To your specific question, one problem with performing measurements on water with various gases (or vacuum) is the vapor pressure of water- some will evaporate, contaminating the gas/vacuum. Consequently, there is a lot more data on mercury which has a much higher vapor pressure and does not evaporate.

http://www.springerlink.com/content/q435735865465450/
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a910127069
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/i360025a014

Sometimes, you will come across a paper with tables of this kind of data- I used to have one for various materials against dry air. If you do, please post it since I would like to have that data easily available as well!
 
Andy, thank you very much for your input. I will continue to search for some relevant litterature.

I have the feeling that replacing air with hydrogen does not make a big change to the surface tension. Can anyone tell whether this is correct. If it is correct, then why?

/Anders
 
Last edited:
Good question- I don't know. There's too many unknowns: the solubility of hydrogen in water, for example. I do know that the interfacial energy of water is pathologically sensitive to contamination, which makes precision measurements difficult.

Girifalco and Good have some papers where they attempt to calculate the interfacial energy from first principles; these came out in the 60's and 70's. I couldn't make heads or tails of it, tho.

Adamson's book "Physical Chemistry of Surfaces" is an excellent resource.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K