MHB Sustainable Gardening Tips for Beginners

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaalChawal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beginners Tips
DaalChawal
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
1628661425748.png
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi DaalChawal,

First a diagram:
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=2]
\def\u{2.5}
\def\v{3.75}
\def\x{1.5}
\def\f{1.5}
\coordinate[label=above: A] (A) at ({-(\u+2)},1.5);
\coordinate[label=below: D] (D) at ({-(\u+2)},-1.5);
\coordinate[label=above: B] (B) at (-\u,.5);
\coordinate[label=below: C] (C) at (-\u,-.5);
\coordinate[label=F] (F) at (-\f,0);
\coordinate[label=F] (F') at (\f,0);

\coordinate[label=below: A'] (A') at ({\v-\x},{-\x/2});
\coordinate[label=above: D'] (D') at ({\v-\x},{\x/2});
\coordinate[label=below: B'] (B') at (\v,{-\x/2});
\coordinate[label=above: C'] (C') at (\v,{\x/2});

\draw (-6,0) -- (5,0);
\draw[ultra thick] (0,-2) -- (0,2) node[ above ] {+};
\filldraw (F) circle (.03);
\filldraw (F') circle (.03);
\draw (A) -- (B) -- (C) -- (D) -- cycle;
\draw (A') -- (B') -- (C') -- (D') -- cycle;
\draw[yshift=-0.1cm, latex-latex] ({-(\u+2)},0) -- node[ below ] {2} (-\u,0);
\draw[xshift=-0.1cm, latex-latex] ({-(\u+2)},1.5) -- node[ above left] {3} ({-(\u+2)},-1.5);
\draw[xshift=-0.1cm, latex-latex] (-\u,0.5) -- node[ above left] {1} (-\u,-0.5);
\draw[yshift=-0.1cm, latex-latex] ({\v-\x)},{\x/2}) -- node[ below ] {$x$} (\v,{\x/2});
\draw[xshift=0.1cm, latex-latex] (\v,{\x/2}) -- node[ above right ] {$x$} (\v,{-\x/2});
\draw[yshift=-0.1cm, latex-latex] (-\u,0) -- node[ below ] {$u$} (0,0);
\draw[yshift=-0.1cm, latex-latex] (0,0) -- node[ below ] {$v$} (\v,0);

\draw[help lines] (B) -- (B');
\draw[help lines] (B) -- (0,0.5) -- (B');
\draw[help lines] (B) -- (0,{-\f/(\u-\f)*0.5}) -- (B');
\draw[help lines] (A) -- (A');
\draw[help lines] (A) -- (0,1.5) -- (A');
\draw[help lines] (A) -- (0,{-\f/((\u+2)-\f)*1.5}) -- (A');

\end{tikzpicture}Let $x$ be the side length of the square in the image.
Let $f$ be the focal length of the lens.
Let $u$ be the distance of $BC$ to the lens and let $v$ be the distance of its image to the lens.
Then $u+2$ is the distance of $AD$ to the lens, and $v-x$ is the distance of its image to the lens.

The magnification of an object, which is the size of the image over the size of the object, is the same as the image distance over the object distance.
So the magnification of $BC$ is: $\frac{B'C'}{BC}=\frac x 1=\frac{v}{u}$.
The magnification of $AD$ is: $\frac{A'D'}{AD} = \frac x 3 = \frac{v-x}{u+2}$.
Furthermore, the lens formula tells us that $\frac 1u+\frac 1v=\frac 1f$ and $\frac 1{u+2}+\frac 1{v-x}=\frac 1f$.

So:
\begin{cases}\frac x 1=\frac{v}{u} \\ \frac x 3= \frac{v-x}{u+2} \\ \frac 1u+\frac 1v=\frac 1f \\ \frac 1{u+2}+\frac 1{v-x}=\frac 1f
\end{cases}

Solve?
 
Last edited:
Thanks, I got it now.
 
I had actually made a couple of mistakes.
The image should be upside down .
And the image of $AD$ is closer instead of further away. That is, its image distance is $v-x$ instead of $v+x$.
It becomes apparent when we actually try to solve the equations.

I've updated the drawing and the formulas in my previous post.
And I've also added some extra help lines to show that it actually works and is to scale.
 
Well sir, I only read your solution that what was the concept used and then I tried on my own and I got the answer 😅
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top