Swapping the limits of integration

Click For Summary
Swapping the limits of integration in a one-dimensional integral results in the negation of the integral, expressed as ∫_a^b f(x) dx = -∫_b^a f(x) dx. This principle is generally accepted, but there are instances where it may be presented as a special case without clarification. In electromagnetism, the potential is defined using the negative of the integral with swapped limits, raising questions about the necessity of this approach. The discussion suggests that this convention may stem from the common practice of defining potential from a point at infinity to a local point. Understanding these nuances is essential for clarity in mathematical applications.
Pythagorean
Science Advisor
Messages
4,416
Reaction score
327
Can you always just swap the limits of integration and flip the sign of a one-dimensional integral or is there a time when you can't do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, \int_a^b f(x) dx= -\int_b^a f(x) dx. Let u= -x. I thought everyone knew this!
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, \int_a^b f(x) dx= -\int_b^a f(x) dx. Let u= -x. I thought everyone knew this!

I was taught that yes... but it's not too uncommon to be taught something that's a special case without being told it's a special case.

The question came from the fact that in electromagnetism, we define the potential by the negative of the integral with swapped limits. I'm not sure why you would put the extra step in there if there wasn't a case where the positive with the limits restored wouldn't be equivalent.

My assumption (given your response) is that they do it simply because we generally define potential from some point at infinity down to a local point.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K