Swing mass overhead - forces involved

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mancer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Mass Swing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a mass attached to a string being spun overhead by a scientist. Participants explore the forces acting on the mass, particularly the role of tension and gravity, and the conditions under which the mass can maintain its position while rotating.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant considers the need for an upward force to counteract gravity as the mass rises, suggesting that tension in the string provides this force initially.
  • Another participant argues that the mass will not rotate in a flat plane but rather in a conical surface, indicating that the tension must always have a vertical component to counteract gravity.
  • A participant questions what keeps the mass from falling when the string is parallel to the ground, proposing that the mass may oscillate due to the tension in the string.
  • A later reply clarifies that the string will never become parallel to the ground, reinforcing the idea that the mass remains in a conical motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the nature of the motion of the mass and the conditions under which it can maintain its position. There is no consensus on how the forces interact as the mass is spun overhead.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the limits of rotation speed and the implications for the forces acting on the mass. The discussion does not clarify the mathematical relationships governing the system.

Mancer
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was considering the simple scenario: A mass is attached to a string, which is then twirled around by a scientist overhead. Assuming the scientist is spinning the mass fast enough, it will eventually be rotating in plane above the scientist.

I'm having some trouble working out the dynamics of this system. Obviously the mass is acted on by gravity, and in order to 'rise' from it's initial position will need a force opposing gravity.

I've reasoned that the tension on the string, while the system is gaining angular momentum from the scientist, will have a component upwards and, provided an appropriate tension, should be enough to get the mass up.

My problem comes when the string eventually is rotating in the plane parallel to the ground; obviously, there is no component of the string tension to oppose gravity. What keeps the mass from falling in this situation?

Best guess is that the mass does indeed fall downward, giving rise to an upward component of the force from the tension in the string, which then returns the mass back to the parallel plane, and oscillates like this while there is still tension in the string.

I considered conservation of angular momentum (neglecting the scientist and frictional forces) but I can't figure how this would stop the mass from falling due to gravity; only that it would have the rotational speed increase as the mass is pulled downward.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mancer said:
Assuming the scientist is spinning the mass fast enough, it will eventually be rotating in plane above the scientist.

No, it will be not plane, but surface of the cone. Plane is a limiting case for infinite rotation speed.
 
Mancer said:
Assuming the scientist is spinning the mass fast enough, it will eventually be rotating in plane above the scientist.
The mass will rotate in a plane, but that plane will always be below the support point. As you yourself have pointed out, you need a component of string tension acting vertically to counteract the force of gravity.

My problem comes when the string eventually is rotating in the plane parallel to the ground; obviously, there is no component of the string tension to oppose gravity. What keeps the mass from falling in this situation?
As Borek points out, the string will never become parallel to the ground.
 
Oops, mass is in a plane, string is on the cone surface, lack of precision on my side.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K