Symmetry of a lagrangian & Noether's theorem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Noether's theorem to a Lagrangian system, specifically analyzing the transformation q->f(q,t) and its implications for conserved quantities. The participant argues that the transformation should be q->q+f(q,t) to yield a constant of motion, as the original transformation leads to a different form that does not conserve the quantity f\frac{\partial L}{\partial q'}. The conclusion drawn is that the exercise may contain a formulation error, as the expected conserved quantity arises only from the corrected transformation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with Noether's theorem
  • Knowledge of calculus, particularly derivatives with respect to time
  • Basic concepts of symmetries in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Noether's theorem in classical mechanics
  • Explore the derivation of conserved quantities from symmetries in Lagrangian systems
  • Investigate different types of transformations in Lagrangian mechanics
  • Review examples of constant motion in various physical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, researchers interested in symmetries and conservation laws, and educators looking for examples of Noether's theorem applications.

irycio
Messages
96
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Assuming that transformation q->f(q,t) is a symmetry of a lagrangian show that the quantity
[tex]f\frac{\partial L}{\partial q'}[/tex] is a constant of motion ([tex]q'=\frac{dq}{dt}[/tex]).

2. Noether's theorem
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether's_theorem

The Attempt at a Solution



Now, what I guess is that this exercise isn't well-formulated. Noether's theorem is obviously first thing that comes to our minds. Quantity mentioned above, however, would be a constant of motion, if the transformation was q->q+f(q,t), not simply q->f(q,t), since the latter transformation leads us to q->q+(f(q,t)-q), and the conserved quantity [tex](f-q)\frac{\partial L}{\partial q'}[/tex].

Am I right and there is a tiny mistake in the exercise or there is a way to show that the given quantity is really conserved? (I tried and failed).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah I think they did mean q-> q+f(q,t), and it smells a lot like q->exp(iat)q
 
Last edited:
Otherwise since q+dq=f(q,t) then dq = t*df/dt
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K