Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Classical Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations
Special and General Relativity
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Nuclear and Particle Physics
Beyond the Standard Model
Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Other Physics Topics
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Classical Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations
Special and General Relativity
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Nuclear and Particle Physics
Beyond the Standard Model
Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Other Physics Topics
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Physics
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Symmetry of the Green-Keldysh-Nambu function
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Paul159, post: 6637548, member: 687371"] Hello, I would like to understand a relation of [URL='http://www.mit.edu/~levitov/jetp/volkovkogan1973.pdf']this article[/URL] by Volkov (eq. 4). Let's define the Green function $$ G^{ij}_{ab} (1,2) = -i \langle T_c \Psi_a (1_i) \Psi_b (2_j) \rangle $$ where ##a,b = (1,2)## are the spin indices and ##i,j = (1,2) ## are the indices for the Keldysh contour ; ##\Psi_1 = \Psi_\uparrow##, ##\Psi_2 = \Psi_\downarrow^\dagger##. ##T_c## is the contour ordering. Now I cite Volkov : "if the system contains no fields acting directly on the spins and if the spin-orbit interaction can be neglected we have : $$ G^{ij*}_{ab} (1,2) = G^{\bar{ij}}_{\bar{ab}} (1,2) $$ where ##\bar{1} = 2, \bar{2} = 1##. " I don't understand why this last symmetry is true. For example I get with the last equation that $$ \langle \Psi_\uparrow (1_1)^\dagger \Psi_\uparrow(2_1) \rangle = \langle \Psi_\downarrow (1_2)^\dagger \Psi_\downarrow(2_2) \rangle ,$$ where 1 is after 2 on the first branch. Thanks in advance for any help. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Physics
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Symmetry of the Green-Keldysh-Nambu function
Back
Top