Classical Symon Mechanics 2nd or 3rd edition?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MidgetDwarf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the differences between the 2nd and 3rd editions of Symon Mechanics. The main distinction highlighted is the addition of two chapters on the theory of relativity in the 3rd edition, along with supplementary problems in the first seven chapters that are generally easier than those in earlier editions. The preference for the 3rd edition is noted due to its simpler problems, which are seen as beneficial for building a solid foundation before tackling more advanced texts like Goldstein. Additionally, there is a critique of the 2nd edition's alterations by some authors, suggesting that the original content is preferable for serious study.
MidgetDwarf
Messages
1,580
Reaction score
698
Hi, was wondering if anyone is familiar with Symon Mechanics 2nd and 3rd edition. Is there a significant difference between these editions? Ie., content, quality of printing, major corrections?
 
  • Like
Likes madscientist_93
Physics news on Phys.org
The preface to the third edition says :

" This third edition differs from the second edition of this text primarily in the
addition of the final two chapters on the theory of relativity, and in the addition to the first seven chapters of some additional problems, similar to those contained in the earlier editions but generally of a lower average level of difficulty. "
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes MidgetDwarf and berkeman
Thanks a ton. It looks like the 3rd edition it will be. The easier problems sold me. I want to go through Goldstein after, so it doesn't hurt to know how to solve simper problems and have a firm foundation to build on.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and madscientist_93
But for Goldstein better use the older 2nd edition than its distortion by some authors who felt obliged to ruin a classic textbook instead of writing their own ;-).
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Hamiltonian and madscientist_93
Hello Intellectuals! So far it seems to be reasonable to learn mathematics in a rigorous way by not solely considering the techniques of problem solving or the applications of a particular subject or concept. Also to truly appreciate the beauty of mathematical endeavor one need to learn the reasoning behind the origination of concepts in mathematics, so as a beginner it appears to be worthwhile to learn the highly abstract aspects of mathematics like proofs, logic, and topics in pure...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
18K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K