Gas Chromatography: Example of Molar Proportion of A & B

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of gas chromatography results, specifically the relationship between the areas under chromatographic peaks and the molar amounts of two substances, A and B, in a mixture. Participants explore the implications of direct proportionality in peak areas and the factors influencing quantification in gas chromatography.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on the meaning of "directly proportional" in the context of peak areas and molar amounts.
  • Another participant explains that if the number of moles of a substance doubles, the area under the corresponding peak will also double, allowing for quantification of A and B.
  • A different participant notes that the relationship between peak area and molar amount may not be 1:1 for different compounds, as it can depend on the specific analyzer and the properties of the molecules being measured.
  • This participant suggests creating a 1:1 mixture of two compounds to determine the relationship between their peak areas accurately, which can aid in calculating reaction yields based on GC traces.
  • Another participant mentions the "internal standard technique" for quantification, where a known amount of a substance is added to facilitate easier calculations of peak areas.
  • A follow-up comment emphasizes the importance of using an unreactive internal standard, suggesting high molecular weight n-alkanes, such as tridecane, for this purpose.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the relationship between peak area and molar amounts, with some suggesting a general 1:1 assumption while others caution that this may not hold true for all compounds. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise nature of these relationships and the best practices for quantification.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight that the relationship between peak area and molar amount can depend on the specific characteristics of the compounds and the gas chromatography setup used, indicating potential limitations in generalizing results without further analysis.

mountain
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
what does it mean when it says; "the areas under the two peaks are directly proportional to the molar amounts of A and B in the mixture?


directly proportional? can anyone give an example of it?

many thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
If the number of moles of substance doubles, the area under the peak will double too. By analyzing the area under the peak, you can quantitate the relative amounts of A and B in the mixture.
 
Depending on the type of analyzer you have on your GC instrument, this won't necessarily be a 1:1 relationship between two different compounds. The relationship for each individual compound is proportional to the number of moles of that compound. Typically GCs use a combustion analysis to measure what is coming off of the column. Therefore, the area under the peak will depend on the particular molecule that is being combusted; in general larger molecules will give a greater peak area because more heat is released in their combustion. The way to solve this problem is to make a 1:1 mixture of two compounds and measure the areas you get from the GC trace of the mixture. Then, since you know that there was an equal number of moles of each compound, you can figure out the proportion that relates the area of the two peaks. This can allow you to calculate the yield of your reaction based just on the GC trace!

Note that in most cases you can assume that the relation between the two different compounds is 1:1, but if you want precise results you should figure out the relation I described.

I bet this sounds complicated. Sorry if I didn't explain it very well.
 
Movies has explained this greatly, but I wanted to add this one. "Internal standard technique" is frequently used for quantification, in which a known amount of substance is added and whose peak is known to occur far from the analyte peaks. So, comparing the peak areas with analyte peaks, a quantification is very easy to calculate.
 
Chem_tr makes a good point. When using internal standards it is also important that the internal standard be unreactive under the conditions of the reaction you are monitoring. High molecular weight n-alkanes are therefore good for this purpose. I frequently use tridecane.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K