Synthetic, exotic particles as a sign of extraterrestrial life

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Life Particles Sign
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of synthetic or exotic particles as potential indicators of extraterrestrial life. Participants explore various hypotheses regarding how such particles could be used to signal the presence of intelligent civilizations, the feasibility of detecting them, and the implications of their existence.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that synthetic particles could serve as a means to broadcast the presence of life, suggesting that an unnaturally large cross-section of rare particles might indicate extraterrestrial civilizations.
  • Others argue that the detection of synthetic particles is analogous to receiving electromagnetic signals, such as television broadcasts, from other galaxies.
  • A participant humorously suggests that a torn three-armed shirt adrift in space could be an obvious sign of alien life.
  • Questions arise about how one could distinguish synthetic particles from naturally occurring ones, with some participants seeking clarity on what makes particles "obviously" synthetic.
  • There is a discussion about the potential for synthetic particles to be unstable and radioactive, raising concerns about their ability to survive the journey through space without decaying.
  • Some participants highlight the challenges of detecting particles compared to electromagnetic radiation, noting that charged particles would be particularly difficult to manage over vast distances due to electromagnetic fields.
  • One participant humorously critiques the practicality of aliens leaving physical objects, like shirts, in space as a means of communication, questioning the logistics involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility and implications of using synthetic particles as indicators of extraterrestrial life. There is no clear consensus, with ongoing debate about the nature of synthetic particles, their detectability, and the practicality of such communication methods.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumptions about the stability of synthetic particles, the conditions under which they could be detected, and the challenges posed by the vast distances in space. The discussion remains open-ended regarding the definitions and implications of synthetic versus naturally occurring particles.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Would obviously synthetic particles traveling through space be a choice to broadcast the presence of life? Likewise, say we detected an unnaturally large cross section of an otherwise rare particle impinging upon Earth; might that vestige be a purposeful indication of extraterrestrial civilization?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure : if we detected tv broadcast from another galaxy, an astrophysicist could call that "synthetic particles" or "unnaturally large rates". :-)

I think I miss you points for some reason on "synthetic" particles. :confused:
 
A torn three armed nylon shirt adrift in space would be an obvious sign of aliens.
 
How would someone know they're synthetic and not naturally occurring elsewhere? What would make them "obviously" synthetic?
 
Particles would much more readily be accelerated to speeds near that of light than macroscopic objects. Their uniqueness would be analogous to the often considered patterns of photons, like a signal of prime numbers or an organized alien transmission.

By "synthetic" I mean unnatural, that which would only arise as the product of intelligent beings. Consider Technetium (element 43), not occurring except rarely outside of the laboratory and justified as such by atomic physics.
 
Last edited:
Loren Booda said:
By "synthetic" I mean unnatural, that which would only arise as the product of intelligent beings. Consider Technetium (element 43), not occurring except rarely outside of the laboratory and justified as such by atomic physics.
In fact, I still understand that what you propose here is the way a particle physicist would describe any sign from an alien planet.

For definiteness, say the "synthetic" particle they use is the "alienon". We know that in the range 10 MeV to 100 MeV, there is in average 0.5 alienon every other millenium per square kilometer coming from a certain angle (direction). Now suddenly we detect in this range of energy zillions of alienons per second per square meter coming from a definite galaxy ! Sure enough something is going one there. It would of course take a while before astrophysicists would appeal to the alien hypothesis.

But, in a particle physics language, there is no difference (in principle) between this scenario and the detection of alien television broadcast. The detection of an alien television broadcast would correspond to an excess of photon (radio waves) in a certain energy range (wavelength) coming from the alien planet. Before we would really conclude this is an alien signal, we would need to be sure that some information has actually been encrypted in it.
 
Last edited:
Agreed. As a possible sign of life in outer space, there would be little difference with the "alienon" and particular electromagnetic broadcasts. However, I have never heard of a human attempt to detect a typical spectrum of other than photons as an indication of life elsewhere. I guess such a search for exotic particles would be less practical (or searching for three-armed shirts much less practical) than searching for E-M waves, so our money is best spent on the last.
 
wolram said:
A torn three armed nylon shirt adrift in space would be an obvious sign of aliens.
:smile: :smile: :smile:
 
I would have thought that the only reason a particle can be synthetic is because it is inherently unstable and radioactive, otherwise it's bound to exist somewhere in nature. With that in mind wouldn't any weird particles beamed to us decay before they got to us? I guess you could accellerate them very close to the speed of light but if you have the energies to do that why not just beam a radio message saying "oi! you're all fat" or something similarly non-natural?

Also what are our chances of actually realising these particles are synthetic? I'm assuming they'd have to travel fast for communication to be remotely meaningful so wouldn't they just go ping as soon as they hit our atmo?
 
  • #10
This whole idea, is, um, well... It is funny though.

Let's go, pretend we are aliens:

Assume 200 billion stars in the Milky Way. Assume 30% are near the sun's
sequence - F, G, K stars

Leaves 60 billion star systems with possible life on them. Exclude multiple
star systems and maybe we get 10 billion possible star systems kinda like
ours.

A three armed T-shirt made of alien_nylon has mass: 100g
(aliens wear size xtra-xtra small)

So we want to place just one T-shirt (where T stands for triarm I guess) in
each star system so another alien can find it floating somewhere in all of
vastness of the quadrillions of cubic kilometers in the star system.

So, we need 100g x 10^10 of alien_nylon. Or 10^9 Kg of alien_nylon.
DuPont makes 5.5 million tons of "earth nylon" per year. So we need
something like years+ of production of alien_nylon by the
AlienPlastics, Inc. company.

All of this just to leave one T-shirt in reasonable star systems -- where
they would be statistically almost impossible to find.

"I love this plan - let's do it." - would be the response of our alien
friends. Until they found out about distribution costs...
 
Last edited:
  • #11
jim mcnamara said:
This whole idea, is, um, well... It is funny though.

Let's go, pretend we are aliens:

Assume 200 billion stars in the Milky Way. Assume 30% are near the sun's
sequence - F, G, K stars

Leaves 60 billion star systems with possible life on them. Exclude multiple
star systems and maybe we get 10 billion possible star systems kinda like
ours.

A three armed T-shirt made of alien_nylon has mass: 100g
(aliens wear size xtra-xtra small)

So we want to place just one T-shirt (where T stands for triarm I guess) in
each star system so another alien can find it floating somewhere in all of
vastness of the quadrillions of cubic kilometers in the star system.

So, we need 100g x 10^10 of alien_nylon. Or 10^9 Kg of alien_nylon.
DuPont makes 5.5 million tons of "earth nylon" per year. So we need
something like hundred thousand years+ of production of alien_nylon by the
AlienPlastics, Inc. company.

All of this just to leave one T-shirt in reasonable star systems -- where
they would be statistically almost impossible to find.

"I love this plan - let's do it." - would be the response of our alien
friends. Until they found out about distribution costs...
I was thinking something much simpler. Bob & Madge Alien are driving their RV star cruiser on a vacation to visit the kids. Bob is looking anxiously through the clothes hamper, under the bed, the closet floor, etc... for his favorite Intergalactic bowling team shirt.

Bob: Madge! have you seen my Intergalactic bowling team shirt?!?

Madge: That ratty old torn thing? I threw that out in the last galaxy we went through.

Bob: Madge! That was my LUCKY shirt!
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Argon4 - "Thanks for the shirt, fellow Galaxian, but I can't get my head through the neck hole!"

Xenon3 - "What the heck's a neck hole - or a head, for that matter?"
 
  • #13
Loren Booda said:
Argon4 - "Thanks for the shirt, fellow Galaxian, but I can't get my head through the neck hole!"

Xenon3 - "What the heck's a neck hole - or a head, for that matter?"
:smile: Loren, you have a great sense of humor. :approve:

WHO MOVED THE SMILIES!?:devil:
 
  • #14
Most unstable particles could not survive the journey through millions of light-years before decaying, even when accelerated to a significant fraction of the speed of light. The decays would push the particles far enough off-course (due to the conservation of momentum) that they'd never arrive at their intended destination anyway.

Futhermore, charged particles would be a very bad idea. The universe is full of enormous electromagnetic fields, and the distances are vast. Shooting charged particles through millions of light-years of space would be like shooting an arrow through a hurricane.

Also, the detection of a stream of particles would be much more difficult than the detection of electromagnetic radiation. I don't know why any intelligent civilization would attempt such communication, when massless, uncharged, non-decaying particles which necessarily travel the speed of light are so readily available.

- Warren
 
Last edited:
  • #15
wolram said:
A torn three armed nylon shirt adrift in space would be an obvious sign of aliens.

You just gave me a great idea for my next prank. Now all I need is a seamstress and a stealth spaceship.
 
  • #16
What do you all think about the possibility of gravitational radiation, deviating from quadrupolarity, being an artificial indicator of advanced extraterrestrials?
 
  • #17
Perhaps I should rather have asked about the possibility of using gravitational waves in the manner of electromagnetic waves (frequency, polarization, magnitude, etc.) as an artificial indicator of advanced extraterrestrials.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 94 ·
4
Replies
94
Views
13K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
8K