Systematic treatment of equilibrium

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the concentrations of [Zn2+], [CN–], and [HCN] in a saturated solution of Zn(CN)2 at a fixed pH of 1.060, utilizing the Ksp for Zn(CN)2 and the Ka for HCN. Participants explore various methods for solving the problem, including mass balance equations and equilibrium expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant summarizes their approach, calculating [H+] and [OH-], and attempts to derive [HCN] and [CN-] using Kb and Ksp equations.
  • Another participant questions the use of Kb and suggests converting it to Ka, proposing that this leads to three equations with three unknowns.
  • Several participants discuss the mass balance equation, with one stating it as [HCN] = 2[Zn2+] - [CN-], while others suggest simplifying it to [HCN] = 2[Zn2+].
  • One participant emphasizes that with known Ka and pH, the equilibrium can be described without considering the reaction of CN- with water.
  • Another participant points out that the algebra involved is straightforward and suggests eliminating variables using the mass balance equation to solve for [CN-].
  • Multiple participants express confusion over the algebraic manipulations and the correct formulation of the Ka equation, with corrections being offered regarding the placement of [H+] and [CN-].
  • One participant acknowledges a mistake in their calculations after receiving feedback and successfully arrives at the correct answer.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the best approach to solve the problem, with participants offering differing methods and corrections. Some participants agree on the need for three equations, while others debate the specifics of the mass balance and equilibrium expressions.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the correct application of equilibrium constants and the algebraic steps involved in solving the equations. There are unresolved issues related to the assumptions made in the mass balance and the treatment of weak acid equilibria.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students studying chemical equilibria, particularly in the context of weak acids and their salts, as well as those looking for different approaches to solving equilibrium problems in a saturated solution.

reminiscent
Messages
131
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Determine [Zn2+], [CN–], and [HCN] in a saturated solution of Zn(CN)2 with a fixed pH of 1.060. The Ksp for Zn(CN)2 is 3.0 × 10–16. The Ka for HCN is 6.2 × 10–10.

Homework Equations


cKfuc5A.png


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't have a phone or camera right now to take a picture of my work, but here's my steps summarized:
1. I found that the [H+]= 0.0871 M.
2. I used that and the Kw equation to find [OH-] = 1.15 x 10^-13 M.
3. I used the mass balance equation to find a new equation for [HCN].
4. I plugged that into the Kb equation, along with the [OH-] in order to find [CN-].
5. I found [CN-] = 4.31 x 10^-24, then plugged that into the Ksp equation to find [Zn2+] = 1.61 x 10^31 and [HCN] = 3.22 x 10^31. The system said my answers were incorrect.
I tried another way using the ICE method and not using systematic treatment of equilibrium, and I found [Zn2+] = 0.2455 M, [CN-] = 0.491 M, and [HCN] = 68.98 x 10^6 M, but the system still said it was wrong.

Please help. ):
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you use Kb and [OH-] instead of just converting Kb to Ka?

reminiscent said:
3. I used the mass balance equation to find a new equation for [HCN].

How?

reminiscent said:
The system said my answers were correct.

Or incorrect?

In general once you convert Kb to Ka you will end with three equations in three unknowns.
 
Borek said:
Why do you use Kb and [OH-] instead of just converting Kb to Ka?
How?
Or incorrect?

In general once you convert Kb to Ka you will end with three equations in three unknowns.
Sorry, I will edit my post for certain mistakes...
They gave us the Ka for HCN is 6.2 × 10–10.
They converted it to Kb. I don't understand what you mean, though.
For the mass balance equation, I just did: [HCN] = 2[Zn2+] - [CN-].
I'm so stuck, I don't understand how to correctly find it.
 
If you are given Ka and pH, there is no need to go through the reaction between CN- and water,

HCN ↔ H+ +CN-

is perfectly enough to describe the HCN/CN- equilibrium.

Write Ka - this will be your first equation (with two unknowns, as pH is fixed).

Second equation is the mass balance (but it can be simplified - see below).

Third equation is Ksp.

That gives three equations in three unknowns, the rest is just a math. HCN is a very weak acid and it is protonated almost quantitatively at so low pH (so [HCN] >> [CN-] and the latter can be ignored in the mass balance).
 
Borek said:
If you are given Ka and pH, there is no need to go through the reaction between CN- and water,

HCN ↔ H+ +CN-

is perfectly enough to describe the HCN/CN- equilibrium.

Write Ka - this will be your first equation (with two unknowns, as pH is fixed).

Second equation is the mass balance (but it can be simplified - see below).

Third equation is Ksp.

That gives three equations in three unknowns, the rest is just a math. HCN is a very weak acid and it is protonated almost quantitatively at so low pH (so [HCN] >> [CN-] and the latter can be ignored in the mass balance).

Okay, I understand - so the equations are:
[HCN] = 2[Zn2+]
Ka = [OH-][HCN]/[CN-] = 6.2 x 10^-10
Ksp = [Zn2+][CN-]^2 = 3.0 x 10^-16

Which one should I solve for first? I think the part of solving is what confuses me.
 
Borek said:
If you are given Ka and pH, there is no need to go through the reaction between CN- and water,

HCN ↔ H+ +CN-

is perfectly enough to describe the HCN/CN- equilibrium.

Write Ka - this will be your first equation (with two unknowns, as pH is fixed).

Second equation is the mass balance (but it can be simplified - see below).

Third equation is Ksp.

That gives three equations in three unknowns, the rest is just a math. HCN is a very weak acid and it is protonated almost quantitatively at so low pH (so [HCN] >> [CN-] and the latter can be ignored in the mass balance).
Okay so far, I made the mass balance equation and Ksp equation equal to each other by isolating [Zn2+], and I solved for [HCN]. Can I just plug that back into the Ka equation, then solve for [CN-] this way? Also, [OH-] would be 1.15 x 10^-13 M, correct?
 
Borek said:
If you are given Ka and pH, there is no need to go through the reaction between CN- and water,

HCN ↔ H+ +CN-

is perfectly enough to describe the HCN/CN- equilibrium.

Write Ka - this will be your first equation (with two unknowns, as pH is fixed).

Second equation is the mass balance (but it can be simplified - see below).

Third equation is Ksp.

That gives three equations in three unknowns, the rest is just a math. HCN is a very weak acid and it is protonated almost quantitatively at so low pH (so [HCN] >> [CN-] and the latter can be ignored in the mass balance).
I got [CN-] = 4.81 x 10-7, [Zn2+] = 0.00130, and [HCN] = 0.00259 and it is still incorrect...
 
I can confirm it is incorrect - but there is not much I can do not seeing what and how you did.
 
I worked this one and it is interesting. I think I got the correct answer. It uses 3 equations and 3 unknowns. Algebraically it is actually kind of simple. In post #5 your ## K_a ## is incorrect and ## [H+] ## belongs in the equation instead of ## [OH-] ##. Since you know the pH, you know the numerical value of ## [H+] ##. The algebra is simple enough that you can use your complete mass balance of equation of post #3. You can eliminate the ## [HCN] ## from the 3 equations using the mass balance equation, and eliminate the ## [Zn+2] ## as well and solve for ## [CN-] ##.
 
  • #10
Charles Link said:
I worked this one and it is interesting. I think I got the correct answer. It uses 3 equations and 3 unknowns. Algebraically it is actually kind of simple. In post #5 your ## K_a ## is incorrect and ## [H+] ## belongs in the equation instead of ## [OH-] ##. Since you know the pH, you know the numerical value of ## [H+] ##. The algebra is simple enough that you can use your complete mass balance of equation of post #3. You can eliminate the ## [HCN] ## from the 3 equations using the mass balance equation, and eliminate the ## [Zn+2] ## as well and solve for ## [CN-] ##.
I think I forgot my algebra skills because I got it wrong again...
Okay I tried what you did. I used the mass balance equation of post 3, plugged that into the Ka equation for [HCN], then I simplified more so I get Ka = 0.0871*2*([Zn2+]/[CN-]). I made the Ksp equation equal to [Zn2+], I plugged that into the Ka equation for [Zn2+]. The [CN-] would have a power of 3 to it, and I got [CN-]=0.00438. It is still wrong.
 
  • #11
Your ## K_a ## equation is incorrect. Your mass balance is ## [CN-]=2[Zn+2]-[HCN] ## and the shortcut version is ## [HCN]=2 [Zn+2] ##. In any case ## [CN-] ## should be in the numerator and doesn't get replaced. You could put either ## [HCN]=(2[Zn+2]) ## or ## [HCN]=(2[Zn+2]-[CN-]) ## in the denominator. (## [CN-] ## is very small, but you really don't need any shortcuts for the algebra.) Y(our number .0871 for the ## [H+] ## for the pH =1.06 looks correct.) Your ## K_a ## equation is also incorrect in post # 5. It is actually a simple equation and should read ## K_a= ([H+][CN-])/[HCN] ##. That appears where your error originated...
 
Last edited:
  • #12
I added a couple of things to post #11. Please be sure to read the latest edited version.
 
  • #13
Charles Link said:
I added a couple of things to post #11. Please be sure to read the latest edited version.
Thank you so much! I can't believe I didn't catch that. I finally got it correct. Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
  • #14
reminiscent said:
Thank you so much! I can't believe I didn't catch that. I finally got it correct. Thank you!

In the future please show your work - it is much easier to find a mistake seeing what was done, than guessing out of rather cryptic description.

Plus, when you try to put your work in a readable format you are quite likely to find mistakes by yourself.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K