T to ∏ Conversion | Solve Homework Statement

  • Thread starter Thread starter eddievic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pi
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on performing a T to ∏ conversion for a circuit problem involving impedances. The participants clarify the use of the Wye to Delta conversion formulas, specifically substituting the impedances Ra, Rb, and Rc with values of 2Z and Z. The correct formulas for Rab, Rbc, and Rac are derived, leading to the conclusion that Rab equals 2.5Z, Rbc equals 5Z, and Rac equals 5Z. The importance of understanding the maximum power transfer theorem is also emphasized for determining load conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of T to ∏ conversion methods
  • Familiarity with Wye to Delta conversion formulas
  • Knowledge of impedance in electrical circuits
  • Concept of maximum power transfer theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Wye to Delta conversion techniques in electrical engineering textbooks
  • Learn about impedance calculations in AC circuits
  • Research the maximum power transfer theorem and its applications
  • Practice solving circuit problems involving T to ∏ conversions
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in analyzing and solving impedance-related problems in electrical circuits.

eddievic
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Perform a T to ∏ conversion on the components marked with an asterix (see attachment)


The Attempt at a Solution



I believe the answer is 6.

Zab = sum of the two impedances connected to terminals "A and B"
+ product of T impedance connected to terminals "A and B"/third impedance

my issue is what should the units be as no units are apparent in the question simply ohms?

Or have I maybe misunderstood this process altogether?

As always any help is appreciated.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
It's obviously not a pure number like "6".

Look for T - pi conversion methods in your textbook or on the Web.
 
I think my issue is three starting values the resistors are indicated by 2Z do i need to convert impedance first?
 
eddievic said:
I think my issue is three starting values the resistors are indicated by 2Z do i need to convert impedance first?
so i found the correct way to convert as per the attachment.

but I am still confused by the initial values being 2Z?
 

Attachments

Please include the diagram showing the various resistors in your attachment.
 
Its the first attachment listed as question 2
 
T as in Tao is 2Pi (I'm on tapatalk so if you put math symbols I only see plain text) Tao represents a full unit circle where as Pi is half.
 
eddievic said:
Its the first attachment listed as question 2

I meant the one that went along with the T to pi.docx.
 
rude man said:
I meant the one that went along with the T to pi.docx.

There is an attachment entitled question 2 that shows the questions diagram
 
  • #10
eddievic said:
There is an attachment entitled question 2 that shows the questions diagram

That's not what I meant
I need a pictorial showing how the R's are distributed. Not the Z's of the problem,.
 
  • #11
rude man said:
That's not what I meant
I need a pictorial showing how the R's are distributed. Not the Z's of the problem,.

Thats the only diagram provided with the question
 
  • #12
Never mind the question. What diagram went along with the T to pi.docx file?
 
  • #13
rude man said:
Never mind the question. What diagram went along with the T to pi.docx file?

I've now included the full question I'm working on exactly as it appears. Hopefully this explains all :)
 
  • #14
eddievic said:
I've now included the full question I'm working on exactly as it appears. Hopefully this explains all :)

its entitled Doc1.docx
 

Attachments

  • #15
eddievic said:
so i found the correct way to convert as per the attachment.

but I am still confused by the initial values being 2Z?

What is question 1? You're supposed to use the result from that to help with the final question.

There are 3 impedances marked with a "*". Let the top left one be Ra in the Wye to Delta formulas. Let the top right one be Rb and the middle impedance be Rc.

The 2Z designation need not be a problem. Simply replace Ra with 2Z, Rb with 2Z and Rc with Z in the formulas. What do you get for Rab when you do that? Then for Rbc and Rac?

Once you do all that, you should be able to get Vout or Zout by combining various series and parallel combinations, and using voltage divider formulas, etc.

Give it a try and show your work.

Once you have Rth (which will be an impedance and not a pure resistance for part c. of problem 2) you can use the maximum power transfer theorem to determine the load for maximum power out.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #16
The Electrician said:
What is question 1? You're supposed to use the result from that to help with the final question.

There are 3 impedances marked with a "*". Let the top left one be Ra in the Wye to Delta formulas. Let the top right one be Rb and the middle impedance be Rc.

The 2Z designation need not be a problem. Simply replace Ra with 2Z, Rb with 2Z and Rc with Z in the formulas. What do you get for Rab when you do that? Then for Rbc and Rac?

Once you do all that, you should be able to get Vout or Zout by combining various series and parallel combinations, and using voltage divider formulas, etc.

Give it a try and show your work.

Once you have Rth (which will be an impedance and not a pure resistance for part c. of problem 2) you can use the maximum power transfer theorem to determine the load for maximum power out.

so T to ∏ conversion:

Rab = Ra x Rb + Ra x Rc + Rb x Rc / Rc
so z x z +z x 2z + z x 2z / 2z
= 2.5 z

so Rbc = 5z
Rac = 5z

is this along the right track?
 
  • #17
OK so far.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K