MHB T31 vector subtraction is not commutative and not associative.

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
Prove, by giving counterexamples, that vector subtraction is not commutative
and not associative.

ok I read all I could on trying to understand this but seem to not see something simple
if we have the example of

$u=\begin{bmatrix}2\\-3\\4\\2\end{bmatrix} v=\begin{bmatrix}-1\\5\\2\\-7\end{bmatrix}
u+v=\begin{bmatrix}2\\-3\\4\\2\end{bmatrix}+\begin{bmatrix}-1\\5\\2\\-7\end{bmatrix}
=\begin{bmatrix}2+(-1)\\-3+5\\4+2\\2+(-7)\end{bmatrix}
=\begin{bmatrix}1\\2\\6\\-5\end{bmatrix}$

if we replace the + with - does that mean it is not commutative and not associative.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If vector subtraction would be commutative, we would have $u-v=v-u$.
Suppose we substitute your $u$ and $v$ into it, does the equality hold then?

If vector subtraction would be associative, we would have $u-(v-w)=(u-v)-w$.
So we need example vectors $u,v,w$ such that those are not equal.
 
ok, that makes sense
 
I don't understand why you added vectors. Why didn't you try subtracting as you were asked to?
Commutative:
$\begin{bmatrix}2\\ -3 \\ 4 \\2 \end{bmatrix}- \begin{bmatrix} -1\\ 5 \\ 2 \\-7\end{bmatrix}= ?$

$\begin{bmatrix} -1\\ 5 \\ 2 \\-7\end{bmatrix}- \begin{bmatrix}2\\ -3 \\ 4 \\2 \end{bmatrix} = ?$

Are they the same?

Associative:
$\left(\begin{bmatrix}2\\ -3 \\ 4 \\2 \end{bmatrix}- \begin{bmatrix} -1\\ 5 \\ 2 \\-7\end{bmatrix}\right)$$- \begin{bmatrix}5\\ -3 \\ 7 \\1 \end{bmatrix}= ?$

$\begin{bmatrix}2\\ -3 \\ 4 \\2 \end{bmatrix}- \left( \begin{bmatrix} -1\\ 5 \\ 2 \\-7\end{bmatrix}- \begin{bmatrix}5\\ -3 \\ 7 \\1 \end{bmatrix}\right)= ?$

Are they the same?
 
so if we have a negative scaler like - 2 we write it as $+(-2)$
 
karush said:
so if we have a negative scaler like - 2 we write it as $+(-2)$
Honestly any way you write it it is still non-commutative, though it does help to remind you that you are subtracting and not adding because vector addition is commutative.

I realize that the problem is simply making a point about vector arithmetic, but the whole issue is that subtraction is not commutative over complex numbers. [math]a_{ij} - b_{ij} \neq b_{ij} - a_{ij}[/math] for any complex numbers.

-Dan
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top