T31 vector subtraction is not commutative and not associative.

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    associative Vector
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of vector subtraction, specifically its non-commutative and non-associative nature. Participants explore these concepts through examples and counterexamples, focusing on the mathematical implications of vector operations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using specific vectors to demonstrate that vector subtraction is not commutative and not associative.
  • Another participant clarifies that for commutativity, the equality $u-v=v-u$ must hold, and proposes substituting specific vectors to test this.
  • For associativity, a participant notes that the equality $u-(v-w)=(u-v)-w$ should be tested with example vectors.
  • A participant questions the initial focus on vector addition rather than subtraction, prompting further exploration of the subtraction operation.
  • One participant emphasizes that regardless of how negative scalars are expressed, the non-commutative nature of subtraction remains evident, particularly in the context of complex numbers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the examples provided, and multiple viewpoints regarding the properties of vector subtraction remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the necessity of specific examples for testing commutativity and associativity, and there is a lack of clarity on the implications of negative scalars in the context of vector operations.

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
Prove, by giving counterexamples, that vector subtraction is not commutative
and not associative.

ok I read all I could on trying to understand this but seem to not see something simple
if we have the example of

$u=\begin{bmatrix}2\\-3\\4\\2\end{bmatrix} v=\begin{bmatrix}-1\\5\\2\\-7\end{bmatrix}
u+v=\begin{bmatrix}2\\-3\\4\\2\end{bmatrix}+\begin{bmatrix}-1\\5\\2\\-7\end{bmatrix}
=\begin{bmatrix}2+(-1)\\-3+5\\4+2\\2+(-7)\end{bmatrix}
=\begin{bmatrix}1\\2\\6\\-5\end{bmatrix}$

if we replace the + with - does that mean it is not commutative and not associative.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If vector subtraction would be commutative, we would have $u-v=v-u$.
Suppose we substitute your $u$ and $v$ into it, does the equality hold then?

If vector subtraction would be associative, we would have $u-(v-w)=(u-v)-w$.
So we need example vectors $u,v,w$ such that those are not equal.
 
ok, that makes sense
 
I don't understand why you added vectors. Why didn't you try subtracting as you were asked to?
Commutative:
$\begin{bmatrix}2\\ -3 \\ 4 \\2 \end{bmatrix}- \begin{bmatrix} -1\\ 5 \\ 2 \\-7\end{bmatrix}= ?$

$\begin{bmatrix} -1\\ 5 \\ 2 \\-7\end{bmatrix}- \begin{bmatrix}2\\ -3 \\ 4 \\2 \end{bmatrix} = ?$

Are they the same?

Associative:
$\left(\begin{bmatrix}2\\ -3 \\ 4 \\2 \end{bmatrix}- \begin{bmatrix} -1\\ 5 \\ 2 \\-7\end{bmatrix}\right)$$- \begin{bmatrix}5\\ -3 \\ 7 \\1 \end{bmatrix}= ?$

$\begin{bmatrix}2\\ -3 \\ 4 \\2 \end{bmatrix}- \left( \begin{bmatrix} -1\\ 5 \\ 2 \\-7\end{bmatrix}- \begin{bmatrix}5\\ -3 \\ 7 \\1 \end{bmatrix}\right)= ?$

Are they the same?
 
so if we have a negative scaler like - 2 we write it as $+(-2)$
 
karush said:
so if we have a negative scaler like - 2 we write it as $+(-2)$
Honestly any way you write it it is still non-commutative, though it does help to remind you that you are subtracting and not adding because vector addition is commutative.

I realize that the problem is simply making a point about vector arithmetic, but the whole issue is that subtraction is not commutative over complex numbers. [math]a_{ij} - b_{ij} \neq b_{ij} - a_{ij}[/math] for any complex numbers.

-Dan
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K