Taking picture of stars from weather balloon

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on capturing images of stars from a weather balloon at altitudes of 15-20 miles. The primary challenge is achieving a stable camera setup to allow for fast exposure times while minimizing sunlight interference. Suggestions include using a camera angled away from the balloon and exploring stabilization methods, such as a fluid-based system. The feasibility of using a spectroscope to capture solar absorption changes at high altitudes is also considered.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic photography principles, particularly exposure settings.
  • Knowledge of weather balloon payload design and deployment.
  • Familiarity with stabilization techniques for cameras in dynamic environments.
  • Experience with spectroscopes and their application in high-altitude imaging.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research lightweight camera options suitable for astrophotography at high altitudes.
  • Explore stabilization techniques, such as fluid-based systems, for long exposure photography.
  • Investigate the use of spectroscopes in capturing solar spectra at varying altitudes.
  • Study the effects of atmospheric conditions on photography from high altitudes.
USEFUL FOR

High school physics teachers, amateur astronomers, students involved in science projects, and enthusiasts interested in high-altitude photography and spectroscopy.

Space_launch
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm a high school physics teacher and my students are building a science payload to launch on a weather balloon. You can look http://www.donorschoose.org/donors/proposal.html?id=458390&challengeid=39361" to see some project details and even donate a couple bucks to help make the project a reality.

So here is the question: How can we take pictures of stars during the day from an altitude of 15-20 miles? I figure that we will be above enough of the atmosphere to make it possible. I'm imagining a camera pointed up at an angle (so it isn't pointing at the balloon) shielded from sunlight. But the big challenge is keeping the camera still, or being able to take the picture with a fast enough exposure.

So are there any cheap cameras that can image stars with a fast exposure? And if not, is there a cheap and lightweight way to keep a camera stationary long enough to image stars?

I'd also love to hook a spectroscope to a camera...maybe take a picture of the sun with it to show the change in absorption at high altitudes. Any thoughts on how I can pull that off?

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I think that should be high enough that you'll see the blackness of space fine. http://www.google.com/images?&q=100000+feet+altitude" are similar pics. Getting stars in a picture though, will be a problem at any height. If the Earth, Sun, or the balloon (illuminated by the Sun) are in the frame then it'll be overly saturated and you won't get stars. See for example this picture from the Moon, which obviously has zero atmosphere:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5c/Earth-moon.jpg"

Since the Earth will fill below, and the balloons and Sun will fill most of above I imagine it may be quite hard to position a camera so that it only sees space. Perhaps you can put one camera on top of the balloons. I don't know enough about photography, but it may be possible to get stars if you increase the exposure, at the expense of totally saturating any part of the image with something illuminated by the Sun in it. You could test this by just trying to get stars to show up in pictures taken at night with something very bright (like a light bulb) in the frame.

As far as keeping it stable for the longer exposure needed, that may be difficult. Perhaps you could rig up something so that it is floating is a small amount of fluid. I'm not sure what kind of winds will be present. However, I'd guess if there are any significant winds keeping the camera still for a long exposure will be nearly impossible.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Look at http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-10-father-son-iphone-hd-camera.html" . I don't think there's a chance for long exposure.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
18
Views
29K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K