Tangent vector to a curve (Differential geometry/Lie theory).

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the tangent vector to the curve c(s) at the identity matrix I_3 in the context of differential geometry and Lie theory. The tangent vector is defined using the derivative of functions from SO(3) to real numbers, leading to the expression X[f] = df(c(s))/ds at s=0. Initial confusion arises regarding the proper differentiation approach, but it is clarified that the focus should be on the matrix dc/ds at s=0. The correct tangent vector is identified as an element of the Lie algebra so(3), represented by the expression -∂/∂x^{12} + ∂/∂x^{21}. This leads to a better understanding of how the tangent vector acts on functions within the group.
B L
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let c(s) = \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> \cos(s) &amp; -\sin(s) &amp; 0 \\<br /> \sin(s) &amp; \cos(s) &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \end{array} \right) be a curve in SO(3). Find the tangent vector to this curve at I_3.

Homework Equations



Presumably, the definition of a tangent vector as a differential operator would be useful here:
If X is the tangent vector to c(s) at I_3 (i.e. s = 0), then for functions f: SO(3) \rightarrow \mathbb{R},
X\left[ f \right] = \frac{df\left(c\left(s\right)\right)}{ds}|_{s=0}

The Attempt at a Solution


The fact that this problem is found in the section of the textbook (Nakahara, Geometry, Topology and Physics) dealing with Lie groups and Lie algebras, together with the fact that the problem asks for the tangent vector to c(s) at the identity leads me to think that we are supposed to use the Lie algebra in some way. However, I can't see how one would do that, so I've tried proceeding naively from the definition:
X\left[ f \right] = \frac{df\left(c\left(s\right)\right)}{ds}|_{s=0}
= \frac{df}{dc} \frac{dc}{ds}|_{s=0}
= \frac{df}{dc} \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 0 &amp; -1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \end{array} \right)

I have no idea how to proceed from here.

Thanks for any and all help!

EDIT: I quickly realized how trivial this is.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are already done. Sort of. X[f] would indeed be df(c(s))/ds at s=0. But that would be a real number. Writing something like df/dc is a little misguided. That would be the derivative of a real function with respect to a matrix. It would be tough to clearly define that. I think all they really want is the matrix dc/ds at s=0. And that you already have.
 
Am I correct in thinking that the corresponding tangent vector (i.e. element of the Lie algebra so(3) \cong T_eSO(3)) would be -\frac{\partial}{\partial x^{12}} +\frac{\partial}{\partial x^{21}}?

Thanks for the help.
 
B L said:
Am I correct in thinking that the corresponding tangent vector (i.e. element of the Lie algebra so(3) \cong T_eSO(3)) would be -\frac{\partial}{\partial x^{12}} +\frac{\partial}{\partial x^{21}}?

Thanks for the help.

Yes, you could write it that way. That would tell you how X acts on a function f:SO(3)->R.
 
I know why I went wrong - what I didn't realize is that by differentiation wrt c, I really meant partial differentiation wrt c^ij (and differentiation of c^ij wrt s) As soon as you do that the problem is trivial.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K