Tangential speed of a rod pivoted from one end

[Vasili]

Homework Statement

A thin, uniform rod of length L and mass M is pivoted from one end. The rod is released from rest in a horizontal position, and allowed to swing downward without friction or air resistance. Suppose a small metal ball of mass m = 2M is attached to the rod a distance d from the pivot. The rod and the ball are released from rest in the horizontal position. (a) Show that when the rod reaches the vertical position, the speed of its tip is:

v_{t} = \sqrt{3gL} \sqrt{(1 + 4(\frac{d}{L}))/(1+6(\frac{d}{L}^{2})

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

I've managed to figure out how they got the \sqrt{3gL} bit, but the rest I have no idea. It looks like they're following the v_{t} = \omega \cdot R formula, because \sqrt{3gL} is the angular velocity of the rod as it passes the vertical, but how \sqrt{(1 + 4(\frac{d}{L}))/(1+6(\frac{d}{L}^{2}) equals the radius from the pivot to the tip of the rod, I have no idea.

What is the new center of mass of this system when you add the ball to it? The center of mass of just the rod is L/2, so is the center of mass after \frac{2}{3}(d-\frac{L}{2})?


In the formula for the tangential velocity of the tip, shouldn't the radius r just be the length L? Or do you have to use the distance to the center of mass here?

I'll keep working on it. Tips would be appreciated.

 

[Hootenanny]

Let's start by thinking about the centre of mass (COM). Looking at your proposed COM what would happen if d<(L/2), i.e. if the ball was placed before the middle of the rod? If this is the case then your expression above would be negative, which would mean that your COM of mass is not on the rod. Does that sound realistic?

 

[Vasili]

Yes, I seem to have problems calculating the centre of mass. The formula for the centre of mass I'm using is:

COM= \frac{m1 X1 + m2 X2}{m1 + m2}

Which in this case is COM= \frac{M \cdot \frac{L}{2} + 2M \cdot d}{3M}

The masses cancel and it leaves L/2 + d. Does that seem more reasonable?

Also, I made an algebraic mistake with the angular velocity of the rod before the mass is added. It's \omega = \sqrt{\frac{3g}{L}}, not \omega = \sqrt 3gL. So then I need to find how it changes when adding a mass 2M at a distance d, and then get their equation for the tangential velocity.

 

[Vasili]

It seems to me that you should be able to represent the motion of the rod as potential energy before = rotational kinetic energy after + potential energy after. Does this formula make sense?

E_{i} = 3(MgL)

E_{f} = \frac{1}{2}I \omega ^{2} + Mg\frac{L}{2} + 2Mgd
I =\frac{1}{3}ML^{2}

3(MgL) = \frac{1}{2}(\\frac{1}{3}3ML^{2}) \omega ^{2} + Mg\frac{L}{2} + 2Mgd

Then you'd solve that for omega, and multiply omega by L (the radius) to get the tangential velocity... But when I work it out I don't get an equation close to the one they get...

 

[Doc Al]

E_{i} = 3(MgL)

OK.

E_{f} = \frac{1}{2}I \omega ^{2} + Mg\frac{L}{2} + 2Mgd

The last term is problematic. "d" is the distance from the pivot, not the other end.

I =\frac{1}{3}ML^{2}

That's just the rotational inertia of the rod. What about the ball?

3(MgL) = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{3}3ML^{2}) \omega ^{2} + Mg\frac{L}{2} + 2Mgd

Redo this after you correct the terms above.

Then you'd solve that for omega, and multiply omega by L (the radius) to get the tangential velocity...

Good.

 

[Vasili]

That's just the rotational inertia of the rod. What about the ball?

Am I really expected to include the moment of inertia of the ball in this? The question doesn't say whether the ball is solid or not. I assume that the axis of rotation goes through the center of the ball, but again the question doesn't say. So there are three possible moments of inertia that the ball could have...

Also, I don't know the radius of the ball, and the moments of inertia of a sphere depend on R.

E_{f} = \frac{1}{2}I \omega ^{2} + Mg\frac{L}{2} + 2Mgd
This becomes E_{f} = \frac{1}{2}I \omega ^{2} + Mg\frac{L}{2} + 2Mg(L-d)?

 

[Hootenanny]

Am I really expected to include the moment of inertia of the ball in this? The question doesn't say whether the ball is solid or not. I assume that the axis of rotation goes through the center of the ball, but again the question doesn't say. So there are three possible moments of inertia that the ball could have...

Since the radius of the ball is small, you may treat it as a point mass. So you need to determine the moment of inertia of a rod of length L with a point particle located at a point d along the length of the rod.

This becomes E_{f} = \frac{1}{2}I \omega ^{2} + Mg\frac{L}{2} + 2Mg(L-d)?

Better

 

[Vasili]

Are they expecting me to write the distance d as \frac{d}{L} instead of L - d, though, to get their formula? Would that work?

Here is the new equation with the moment of inertia of the particle:

3(MgL) = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{3} ML^{2}) \omega ^{2} + \frac{1}{2}(2M(\frac{d}{L}^{2})) \omega ^{2}+ Mg\frac{L}{2} + 2Mg(\frac{d}{L})

 

[Doc Al]

Are they expecting me to write the distance d as \frac{d}{L} instead of L - d, though, to get their formula? Would that work?

No, that makes no sense. d/L is a fraction, not a distance. Don't worry about getting the final version of the formula until you solve for v.

Here is the new equation with the moment of inertia of the particle:

3(MgL) = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{3} ML^{2}) \omega ^{2} + \frac{1}{2}(2M(\frac{d}{L}^{2})) \omega ^{2}+ Mg\frac{L}{2} + 2Mg(\frac{d}{L})

Fix those terms where you have d/L.

 

[Vasili]

Okay, so you get: 3(MgL) = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{3} ML^{2}) \omega ^{2} + \frac{1}{2}(2M((L-d)^{2})) \omega ^{2}+ Mg\frac{L}{2} + 2Mg(L-d)

But to be honest, I don't know where to begin simplifying this to solve for omega. Where do I even start?

 

[Doc Al]

Okay, so you get: 3(MgL) = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{3} ML^{2}) \omega ^{2} + \frac{1}{2}(2M((L-d)^{2})) \omega ^{2}+ Mg\frac{L}{2} + 2Mg(L-d)

But to be honest, I don't know where to begin simplifying this to solve for omega. Where do I even start?

Start by correcting the 2nd term. What's the distance between the ball and the axis?

 

[Vasili]

Ah.
3(MgL) = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{3} ML^{2}) \omega ^{2} + \frac{1}{2}(2M(d)^{2}) \omega ^{2}+ Mg\frac{L}{2} + 2Mg(L-d)

Now is there anything *else* that's wrong with the formula?

 

[Doc Al]

Ah.
3(MgL) = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{3} ML^{2}) \omega ^{2} + \frac{1}{2}(2M(d)^{2}) \omega ^{2}+ Mg\frac{L}{2} + 2Mg(L-d)

Good! Now you can start simplifying.

 

[Vasili]

6(MgL) = (\frac{1}{3} ML^{2}) \omega ^{2} + (2M(d)^{2}) \omega ^{2}+ Mg L + Mg(L-d)

Divide 2M(d^{2}) out:

\frac{3gL}{(d^{2})} = \frac{1}{6} \frac{L^{2}}{(d^{2})} \omega ^{2} + \omega ^{2}+ \frac{g L}{(2(d^{2})} + \frac{gL}{d}... Like I said, I don't know how to simplify this.

 

[Doc Al]

Isolate ω.

 

[Vasili]

I realized that I had to isolate omega, as is obvious by the fact that I put in my posts precisely that:

Then you'd solve that for omega, and multiply omega by L (the radius) to get the tangential velocity...

But to be honest, I don't know where to begin simplifying this to solve for omega.

What I did not know is how to begin simplifying this equation.

There is a difference between gently nudging someone toward the right answer and being deliberately vague and unhelpful.

 

[Doc Al]

I realized that I had to isolate omega,

Then do it! That's the first step.

Your right hand side has two terms that don't contain omega. Move them!

The physics is done. Now comes a little algebra.