Tangential velocity of rotating rod

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the tangential velocity of a rotating rod and the derivation of its final velocity equation. Initial calculations for tension and normal force are confirmed as correct, leading to a derived expression for the final angular velocity. A discrepancy arises when comparing the calculated final velocity with a textbook value, prompting a request for clarification. The error is identified as using the incorrect moment of inertia, as the rod rotates about its end rather than its center of mass. The discussion concludes with an acknowledgment of the mistake and appreciation for the clarification provided.
lorenz0
Messages
151
Reaction score
28
Homework Statement
A homogeneous rod of mass ##m## and length ##L## can rotate without friction around the pin ##O##. The rod is balanced in the situation in the figure thanks to the presence of an ideal horizontal rope fixed to the vertical wall, which causes the angle between the wall and rod to be ##\theta##. Calculate: 1) Tension ##T## of the rope and the reaction ##N## of the pin; 2) the kinetic energy of the rod when it reaches the vertical position after the rope has been cut; 3) the tangential speed of the free end of the rod when it reaches the vertical position
Relevant Equations
##\tau=r\times F, F=ma, E=U_{grav}+E_K, E_{K_rot}=\frac{1}{2}I\omega^2##
1) ##LT\sin(\frac{\pi}{2}-\theta)-\frac{L}{2}mg\sin\theta=0\Rightarrow T=\frac{mg}{2}\tan\theta##.

##N_{x}-T=0, N_{y}-mg=0\Rightarrow N=\sqrt{N_x ^2+N_y ^2}=mg\sqrt{(\frac{\tan\theta}{2})^2 +1}##

2) ##E_{k_{fin}}=mg\frac{L}{2}[1+\cos\theta]##

3) ##mg\frac{L}{2}[\cos\theta+1]=\frac{1}{2}I_O \omega_f^2=\frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{12}mL^2) \omega_f^2\Rightarrow \omega_f=\sqrt{\frac{12g[\cos\theta +1]}{L}}\Rightarrow v_f=L\omega_f=\sqrt{12gL[1+\cos\theta]}##

Now the first two results are correct, but for ##v_f## the book gives ##v_f=\sqrt{3gL[1+\cos\theta]}## and I don't see why so I would appreciate an explanation. Thanks

---

##mg\frac{L}{2}[\cos\theta+1]=\frac{1}{2}I_O \omega_f^2=\frac{1}{2}(I_{CM}+m(\frac{L}{2})^2 \omega_f^2=\frac{1}{2}((\frac{1}{12}+\frac{1}{4})mL^2 ) \omega_f^2=\frac{1}{6}mL^2\omega_f^2\Rightarrow \omega_f=\sqrt{\frac{3g[\cos\theta +1]}{L}}\Rightarrow v_f=L\omega_f=\sqrt{3gL[1+\cos\theta]}##
 

Attachments

  • rotating_rod.png
    rotating_rod.png
    28.4 KB · Views: 146
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Physically how could the result not depend upon theta?
How did you eliminate it?
 
hutchphd said:
Physically how could the result not depend upon theta?
How did you eliminate it?
I don't get what you are referring to: every single one of the results depends on ##\theta##.
 
lorenz0 said:
I don't get what you are referring to: every single one of the results depends on θ.
Oops sorry it got cut off on my display!
 
lorenz0 said:
##\dots## and I don't see why so I would appreciate an explanation. Thanks
You used the wrong moment of inertia. The rod is rotating about its end, not about its CM.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd and lorenz0
kuruman said:
You used the wrong moment of inertia. The rod is rotating about its end, not about its CM.
Ah, of course! Such a stupid mistake. Thank you very much!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top