Taylor expanding a physics formula

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Taylor expansion of a physics formula related to the energy of a photon emitted by a hydrogen atom transitioning from an excited state to a lower state. The original poster presents a formula for the change in energy, DeltaE, incorporating momentum and kinetic energy considerations, and seeks guidance on how to perform a Taylor expansion on this formula.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the need to express DeltaE in terms of energy and mass, questioning the role of momentum in the expansion. There are discussions about substituting momentum with mass and velocity, and the implications of the conservation of momentum on the relationship between energy and frequency. Some participants express confusion about the correct form of the equations and the process of Taylor expanding the derived expressions.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and corrections to each other's equations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of the quadratic formula and the Taylor expansion, but there remains a lack of consensus on the correct approach to derive the correction to the energy formula.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of working with the equations derived from previous parts of the problem, emphasizing the need to adhere to the constraints set by the problem statement. There are indications of confusion regarding the presence and role of certain terms in the equations, particularly concerning the momentum and energy relationships.

SU403RUNFAST
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
< Mentor Note -- thread moved to HH from the technical math forums, so no HH Template is shown >[/color]

So the original problem was that a stationary hydrogen atom changed states from excited to lower state and emitted a photon, i solved for the energy of the photon hf taking into account the kinetic energy of the recoiling atom since the photon released and the atom recoiling have equal and opposite momenta.
I came up with the formula, sorry i tried latexing everything but it wouldn't work for me:
DeltaE=-pc+(p^2)/2m, both momentum p's are the atoms. The problem says I need to taylor expand this formula for small deltaE and keep the first two terms. I don't know how to taylor expand something random like this, a physics formula.
Or it means taylor expand DeltaE=hf, but I am pretty sure its the first one... please help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you have to find DeltaE in terms of E and m first, without the (unknown) momentum in it. Then assume E/(mc^2) is small.
 
But there is no E. This is part b of a problem, it says use the formula found in part a and taylor expand it.[my first formula that i solved for DeltaE=-pc+(p^2)/2m] I can replace p with mv, but there will be no E only deltaE. I don't know how to taylor expand something really. DeltaE=-mvc+.5mv^2 is after replacing p though. This question totally threw me off.
 
Oh and it says that the first two terms after expanding will provide the correction for the formula deltaE=hf=hc/lambda.
 
Conservation of momentum implies that ##p## is proportional to ##f##. Once you account for ##\hbar##s and ##\pi##s, energy conservation gives a quadratic equation for ##f## in terms of ##\Delta E##. I think the problem wants you to determine ##f## by finding the roots of the equation. The Taylor expansion is for the square root in the quadratic formula.
 
It looks like you saying my equation is wrong, so I have been solving for a new one, but am going in circles. I know that hf=deltaE-(p^2)/2m, this is my energy equation, and using momentum to plug in for deltaE or p in terms of other variables is not giving me a quadratic in any of my attempts
 
SU403RUNFAST said:
It looks like you saying my equation is wrong, so I have been solving for a new one, but am going in circles. I know that hf=deltaE-(p^2)/2m, this is my energy equation, and using momentum to plug in for deltaE or p in terms of other variables is not giving me a quadratic in any of my attempts

The equation in your OP has an incorrect minus sign in the ##pc## term, but the version above looks correct. I believe that ##p=hf/c##, so you need to use that to write the equation in terms of ##f##, ##\Delta E## and ##m##. You can then solve this for ##f## and use the Taylor expansion to compare to the approximation ##f = \Delta E/h##.
 
Ive been getting this same equation but two terms cancel out... hf=deltaE-[(hf/c)^2]/(2m), when you simplify hf's cancel out if you plug in deltaE=hf. If i leave the deltaE alone i get hf=deltaE-{([h^2][f^2])2m} all over c^2. It doesn't ever make a quadratic
 
SU403RUNFAST said:
Ive been getting this same equation but two terms cancel out... hf=deltaE-[(hf/c)^2]/(2m), when you simplify hf's cancel out if you plug in deltaE=hf. If i leave the deltaE alone i get hf=deltaE-{([h^2][f^2])2m} all over c^2. It doesn't ever make a quadratic

You don't plug in ##\Delta E =hf##, you are trying to solve for ##f## since your analysis corrects that formula. The equation

$$ \frac{h^2}{2m} f^2 + h f - \Delta E=0$$

is the quadratic equation to be solved.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SU403RUNFAST
  • #10
I know that but where did the c^2 go?
 
  • #11
SU403RUNFAST said:
I know that but where did the c^2 go?

I was being sloppy and copied the 2nd formula you wrote. The denominator should be ##2mc^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SU403RUNFAST
  • #12
okay thanks I am working on it
 
  • #13
Well i solved the equation for two values, i set hf=x to simplify and make it easier, then using quadratic formula x=-mc^2 plus or minus the root of ([m^2][c^4]+[2mc^2][deltaE]), i have no idea on how to taylor expand the equation though...
 
  • #14
So you have
$$hf = -mc^2 \pm \sqrt{(mc^2)^2 + 2 mc^2 \Delta E} = mc^2 \left(-1 \pm \sqrt{1+\frac{2 \Delta E}{mc^2}}\right).$$ As fzero said earlier, "The Taylor expansion is for the square root in the quadratic formula."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SU403RUNFAST
  • #15
So I got 1 + DeltaE/mc^2 - (DeltaE^2)/(m^2c^2), so to keep only the first two terms i ignore the last one i believe. If this is correct how is this a correction to DeltaE=hf=hc/lambda?
 
  • #16
Your expansion isn't quite correct – probably just algebra mistakes. You want to keep all three terms. If you keep only the first two terms, you recover ##hf = \Delta E##. The third term of the expansion is what leads to the first correction to the energy of the photon.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SU403RUNFAST
  • #17
okay i see my mistake and fixed it, 1 + DeltaE/mc^2 - (DeltaE^2)/(2m^2c^4) how did you see the correction? As in how do you see that hf=deltaE from the taylor expansion
 
  • #18
You have to plug the expansion into your expression for hf.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SU403RUNFAST
  • #19
thank you i have solved for the correction
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K