Taylor polynomial of f(x) = 1/(1-x) and the estimate of its remainder

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the Taylor polynomial for the function f(x) = 1/(1-x) up to the 5th degree, centered at 0, and estimating the remainder of this polynomial approximation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the Taylor polynomial and the application of the Lagrange form of the remainder. Questions arise regarding the validity of the remainder estimate and whether a different interval might yield a better estimate.

Discussion Status

Some participants acknowledge the approach taken and clarify that the remainder estimate is a maximum upper bound rather than a precise estimate. There is an exploration of whether a smaller interval would be more appropriate, though no consensus is reached on the necessity of this adjustment.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of a specified range for the interval, leading to discussions about the implications of choosing different intervals for the remainder estimate.

Ryker
Messages
1,080
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Find the Taylor polynomial for f(x) = 1/(1-x), n = 5, centered around 0. Give an estimate of its remainder.

The Attempt at a Solution


I found the polynomial to be 1 + x + x2 + x3 + x4 + x5, and then tried to take the Lagrange form of the remainder, say, for x in [-1/2, 1/2].

Then I get
[tex]R_{5}(x) = \frac{f^{6}(a)}{6!}x^{6}[/tex]

But
[tex]f^{6}(a) = \frac{720}{(1-a)^{7}},[/tex]
so for the largest values of a and x, that is 1/2, you get that
[tex]|R_{5}(x)| \leq \frac{(\frac{1}{2})^{6}}{(\frac{1}{2})^{7}} = 2,[/tex]
which means the best estimate we can give is that the remainder is less than 2. But that doesn't make much sense to me, because the 5-th degree polynomial is fairly accurate on [-1/2, 1/2] and really close to f(x), so how I am getting such results? Have I made a mistake somewhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks fine to me. The remainder 'estimate' isn't really an estimate of the remainder. It's a maximum upper bound for the remainder. In this case it's a pretty pessimistic estimate, probably because you're nearing the singularity at x=1.
 
Hey, thanks for the reply. Yeah, I figured it's only the maximum upper bound, so should I have taken a smaller interval? I mean, we aren't really given any specific range, so I guess we can choose our own, it's just that I didn't want to choose one, smaller than [-1/2, 1/2]. Or am I right in thinking none of this really matters, as long as you show how you got to that estimate?
 
Ryker said:
Hey, thanks for the reply. Yeah, I figured it's only the maximum upper bound, so should I have taken a smaller interval? I mean, we aren't really given any specific range, so I guess we can choose our own, it's just that I didn't want to choose one, smaller than [-1/2, 1/2]. Or am I right in thinking none of this really matters, as long as you show how you got to that estimate?

I don't see anything wrong with what you've got. Maybe they just want the expression for R_5, not a specific number.
 
I put down both just in case anyway, so I guess I should be covered then :smile: Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K