Taylor Series Expansion - Don't understand how to use

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on approximating the function V(x) = V0(1 - e^(x/a))^2 - V0 using Taylor Series Expansion. The user struggles with linearizing the function without a specific point of approximation and seeks clarification on the correct application of the Taylor series. The correct approach involves expanding the exponential function e^(x/a) around x=0, retaining only the necessary terms to derive the second-order approximation. The final expression derived is V(x) = V0(1 - (1/2a^2)x^2) - V0, which aligns with the Taylor series methodology.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Taylor Series Expansion
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and their derivatives
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
  • Knowledge of approximating functions using series
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Taylor Series for e^x and its applications in physics
  • Learn about higher-order approximations and their significance in calculus
  • Explore the concept of linearization in mathematical modeling
  • Practice deriving Taylor Series expansions for various functions
USEFUL FOR

Students in calculus, physicists working with potential functions, and anyone interested in mathematical modeling using Taylor Series.

jumbogala
Messages
414
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


This is actually not a problem, it's something in my notes. The function I am supposed to be approximating is

V(x) = V0(1 - ex/a)2 - V0

V0 and a are constants.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


It says that the function given is not a parabola. But it can be approximated to a parabola by approximating to the 2nd order term.

Then it says, 2nd order V = V0[(x/a)2 - 1].

Maybe I copied it wrong, but I thought I needed to approximate about a certain value. If you don't know that value, how can you linearize the function?

Also, my understanding is that Taylor expansion uses the formula given here http://mathworld.wolfram.com/TaylorSeries.html

But when I differentiate V(x) I get something completely different.

Can someone either help me get to the result in my notes, or if that result is wrong, help me get the right answer?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like they may have taken V0 = 1 and a = 1, and approximated around 0, if that helps.

Even when I do that though, I get zeros as my coefficients.
 
They're expanding about x=0. Instead of grinding out the series for V(x) using the definition of the Taylor series, try expanding the exponential in a series about x=0, keeping only terms that will in the end contribute to the x2 term, and then doing some algebra.
 
Thanks for your reply. What do you mean by try expanding the exponential in a series about x=0?

You mean just take e^(x/a) and expand that, still using a Taylor series? If I do that I get
the second derivative is (e^(x/a))/a^3

So the term that will contribute to the x^2 term is (1/2a^3)x^2.

Then would I replace the e^(x/a) term in my original equation? If I do I still don't get the same thing. I still don't quite get it...
 
What is the Taylor series for ex about the point x=0? Plug in x/a for x. That's the series for ex/a. Then plug that into your potential function.
 
Ok.

The taylor series for ex about x = 0 is:
1 + x + (1/2)x2 + (1/6)x3 + ...
Keeping only the x2 term, we have (1/2)x2.

Now, subbing in x/a for x, we get (1/2)(x/a)2.
How come what I did first didn't work? Shouldn't it work out to be the same thing...?

So now plugging my answer into my potential function, I get:
V(x) = V0(1 - (1/2a2)x2) - V0

Still doesn't match =(

Actually with a bit more algebra I get V0 /2 = [-(x/a)2]
 
jumbogala said:
Ok.

The taylor series for ex about x = 0 is:
1 + x + (1/2)x2 + (1/6)x3 + ...
Keeping only the x2 term, we have (1/2)x2.
The idea is that when x<<1, only the first few terms of the series contribute significantly to the sum, so you can approximate the sum well enough by neglecting higher-order terms. That doesn't mean you can just toss everything except one term.

Try keeping just the first three terms of the series and see how it works out.
Now, subbing in x/a for x, we get (1/2)(x/a)2.
How come what I did first didn't work? Shouldn't it work out to be the same thing...?

So now plugging my answer into my potential function, I get:
V(x) = V0(1 - (1/2a2)x2) - V0

Still doesn't match =(

Actually with a bit more algebra I get V0 /2 = [-(x/a)2]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K