Taylor series for cartesian circle equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Maclaurin series expansion of the function √(1 - x²), which is essential for physics applications involving the binomial series. The correct series expansion is identified as 1 - (x²/2) - (x⁴/8) - (x⁶/16) - ... - (x²n/2ⁿ). The user initially struggles with obtaining the correct derivatives, specifically noting that odd derivatives evaluated at zero yield zero, leading to confusion. Ultimately, the user resolves their misunderstanding with assistance from another participant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maclaurin series and Taylor series expansions
  • Familiarity with binomial series and their applications
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, particularly derivatives
  • Proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Maclaurin series for √(1 - x²)
  • Explore the properties of binomial series and their convergence
  • Practice calculating higher-order derivatives of functions
  • Learn LaTeX formatting for mathematical expressions
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or mathematics, educators teaching calculus, and anyone interested in series expansions and their applications in real-world problems.

wil3
Messages
177
Reaction score
1
Hello. For a physics course, I need to often make use of the binomial series and it's corollary, the expansion of:

\sqrt{1-x^2}

This probably sounds rather stupid, but for some reason, when I do a MacClaurin expansion of this series, I cannot seem to generate the correct series, which I know from texts to be:

1-\frac{x^2}{2}-\frac{x^4}{8}-\frac{x^6}{16}-...- \frac{x^{2n}}{2^n}

I keep on getting that the derivative evaluated at zero are zero, which, to me, suggests that there is some sort of trick to this series derivation that I am missing. Any advice?

Thank you very much.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hello wil3! :smile:

(have a square-root: √ and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
wil3 said:
… I keep on getting that the derivative evaluated at zero are zero, which, to me, suggests that there is some sort of trick to this series derivation that I am missing.

(this is √(1 - x2))

the odd derviatives should be zero, but not the even ones …

show us how you got the second derivative :smile:
 
...oh my, well that's embarrassing. I got it now. Thanks for pointing that out.

I also fixed the LaTex- still getting used to the syntax.

Thank you very much
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
16K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K