Taylor Series of the inverse tangent function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the 2005th derivative at zero of the function f(x) = tan-1((1+x)/(1-x)), within the context of Taylor Series expansions. Participants are exploring the properties and calculations related to Taylor Series, particularly for the inverse tangent function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to relate the Taylor Series of arctangent to the specific function given. There are discussions about substituting variables and determining coefficients for specific derivatives. Some participants suggest starting with simpler cases to build understanding.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations and approaches being explored. Some participants have offered hints and suggestions for further investigation, particularly regarding the relationship between derivatives of the functions involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the nature of f(2005)(0) as a specific value versus a function of x. Participants are also considering the implications of substituting values into the Taylor Series and the need to expand series properly to find specific coefficients.

kudoushinichi88
Messages
125
Reaction score
2
I have a shaky understanding of problems concerning Taylor Series. For example, the question below.

Let f(x)=\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{1+x}{1-x}\right) where -\frac{1}{2}\leq x \leq \frac{1}{2}. Find the value of

f^{2005}(0)

the Taylor Series of \tan^{-1} is

\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^nx^{2n+1}}{2n+1}

my friend told me to set k=2n+1 and after an attempt to solve this, I got

f^{2005}(0)=\left(\frac{1+x}{x(1-x)}\right)^{2005}(2004!)

I'm not sure if I'm doing this right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you have doesn't even make sense. The left side, f^{2005}(0), is a specific number, not a function of x.

Given that the Taylor's series for arctangent is
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^nx^{2n+1}}{2n+1}
you can then replace that x with (1+ x)/(x(1- x)) but then you have to expand that to get a power series and determine n so that x has power 2005.

f^{2005}(0) is the coefficient not entire term.
 
May I add something too please? I would suggest he first solve the problem for just arctan(u), just that one, say for the fourth or fifth or like me, the seventh derivative. Get that straight, then go for the other one. So:

f(u)=\arctan(u)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!} u^n=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n u^{2n+1}}{2n+1}

See, that's already a good start. Then that means:

\frac{f^{(2n+1)}(0)}{(2n+1)!}=\frac{(-1)^n}{2n+1}

or:

f^{(2n+1)}(0)=(-1)^n \frac{(2n+1)!}{2n+1}

Now, here's the very important part I wish to emphasize: check that in Mathematica, say for the seventh derivative. Then in that case, n=3 right? so:

Code:
In[18]:=
D[ArcTan[x], {x, 7}] /. x -> 0
N[((-1)^3/7)*7!]

Out[18]=
-720

Out[19]=
-720.

Now, here's a hint to solve your problem, take:

\frac{d}{du} \arctan(u)

and:

\frac{d}{dx}\arctan(\frac{1+x}{1-x})

What do you notice about the two derivatives and then all the other higher order derivatives?
 
So... subbing \frac{1+x}{1-x} into,

<br /> \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^nx^{2n+1}}{2n+1}<br />

I have

<br /> \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^n\left(\frac{1+x}{1-x}\right)^{2n+1}}{2n+1}<br />,

By setting 2n+1=2005, and comparing with the general representation of a taylor series,

<br /> \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{f^n(a)}{n!}(x-a)^n<br />

I finally got

\frac{1002!}{2005}

Is this correct?
 
No, that's not correct. I would strongly recommend you consider jackmell's hint about comparing the first derivatives of those two functions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K